Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

modifying caretaker behavior

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
9/7/2020 3:26:49 AMunknownrankShaman before revert after revert
Before After
1 Basically the nonhost players cannot issue orders to the group's constructors unless they issue rapid move orders in succession (taking 2-3s to unjam a single con). 1 Basically the nonhost players cannot issue orders to the group's constructors unless they issue rapid move orders in succession (taking 2-3s to unjam a single con).
2 \n 2 \n
3 This behavior lead me to remove the widget upon the user commsharing. However that was reverted due to a typo in the commshare gadget's improvements causing some errors to pop up when a spectator joined in. This is resolved in [url=https://github.com/ZeroK-RTS/Zero-K/pull/4088]this pr though[/url]. GBC also breaks with commshare for the same reason. 3 This behavior lead me to remove the widget upon the user commsharing. However that was reverted due to a typo in the commshare gadget's improvements causing some errors to pop up when a spectator joined in. This is resolved in [url=https://github.com/ZeroK-RTS/Zero-K/pull/4088]this pr though[/url]. GBC also breaks with commshare for the same reason.
4 \n
5 [q]Ideally I could improve caretaker behavior with a widget that is accepted as default on by the devs.[/q]
6 \n
7 Better for it to be a gadget imo. Though this could lead to state clutter.