| 1 |
[quote]So I wouldn't say there are any "nonsense" maps, since I would expect an overwhelming majority of map banners to have those in their bans. As long as this remains the case, I think you can be safe to assume that there are no maps that players "have to spend their bans on".[/quote]
|
1 |
[quote]So I wouldn't say there are any "nonsense" maps, since I would expect an overwhelming majority of map banners to have those in their bans. As long as this remains the case, I think you can be safe to assume that there are no maps that players "have to spend their bans on".[/quote]
|
| 2 |
I broadly agree with this. My point is that, based on my knowledge of the map pool and having managed map rotations in the past, if the map pool was *expanded* much we would encounter "nonsense maps" pretty quickly.
|
2 |
I broadly agree with this. My point is that, based on my knowledge of the map pool and having managed map rotations in the past, if the map pool was *expanded* much we would encounter "nonsense maps" pretty quickly.
|
| 3 |
\n
|
3 |
\n
|
| 4 |
(In my mind a single map out of 18 which nearly half of the relevant players feels the need to ban nudges pretty close to being "nonsense" but perhaps does not quite reach it.)
|
4 |
(In my mind a single map out of 18 which nearly half of the relevant players feels the need to ban nudges pretty close to being "nonsense" but perhaps does not quite reach it.)
|
|
|
5 |
\n
|
|
|
6 |
edit: Requiring less experienced players to learn 20+ maps to be familiar with the matchmaking pool carries costs as well.
|
1v1 Matchmaker Maps Rotation