Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

B963343 2 on Ravaged_v2 (Multiplayer)

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
9/27/2020 1:22:48 AMAUrankAdminGoogleFrog before revert after revert
9/27/2020 1:21:02 AMAUrankAdminGoogleFrog before revert after revert
Before After
1 What was your claim? My guess is that it is about the popularity of spiders on a map ( Ravaged?) under some elo-culling of the data. 1 What was your claim? My guess is that it is about the popularity of spiders on a map ( Ravaged?) under some elo-culling of the data. ( Also, don't feel the need to backfill a widely applicable or strong claim if you were just making an addendum or similar comment) .
2 \n 2 \n
3 Don't use the pie charts if you're trying to make a claim about winrate as they are very misleading. I can feel the psychology of those charts telling me that Spider is really favoured, just look at the massive swing on the left!. However if I calm down and eyeball some numbers off your screenshot then the data is much less impressive. Lets say Spiders are in 66.6% of wins and 52% of losses, the corresponds to a winrate of merely 0.56. You can see the same thing happening in my screenshot (where I provide some numbers). 3 Don't use the pie charts if you're trying to make a claim about winrate as they are very misleading. I can feel the psychology of those charts telling me that Spider is really favoured, just look at the massive swing on the left!. However if I calm down and eyeball some numbers off your screenshot then the data is much less impressive. Lets say Spiders are in 66.6% of wins and 52% of losses, the corresponds to a winrate of merely 0.56. You can see the same thing happening in my screenshot (where I provide some numbers).