Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

Further escalation of the clusterfuck-tensions

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
10/19/2020 3:56:57 PMEErankAdminAnarchid before revert after revert
10/19/2020 3:53:08 PMEErankAdminAnarchid before revert after revert
10/19/2020 3:52:40 PMEErankAdminAnarchid before revert after revert
10/19/2020 3:52:10 PMEErankAdminAnarchid before revert after revert
10/19/2020 3:48:41 PMEErankAdminAnarchid before revert after revert
10/19/2020 3:47:44 PMEErankAdminAnarchid before revert after revert
10/19/2020 3:46:56 PMEErankAdminAnarchid before revert after revert
10/19/2020 3:44:23 PMEErankAdminAnarchid before revert after revert
10/19/2020 3:42:37 PMEErankAdminAnarchid before revert after revert
10/19/2020 3:41:51 PMEErankAdminAnarchid before revert after revert
10/19/2020 3:41:40 PMEErankAdminAnarchid before revert after revert
10/19/2020 3:40:58 PMEErankAdminAnarchid before revert after revert
10/19/2020 3:40:37 PMEErankAdminAnarchid before revert after revert
10/19/2020 3:39:11 PMEErankAdminAnarchid before revert after revert
10/19/2020 3:24:59 PMEErankAdminAnarchid before revert after revert
10/19/2020 3:12:45 PMEErankAdminAnarchid before revert after revert
10/19/2020 3:10:46 PMEErankAdminAnarchid before revert after revert
10/19/2020 3:08:58 PMEErankAdminAnarchid before revert after revert
10/19/2020 3:08:16 PMEErankAdminAnarchid before revert after revert
Before After
1 [q]- got upset about people that he percieved to be playing bad on purpose in clusterfuck[/q] 1 [q]- got upset about people that he percieved to be playing bad on purpose in clusterfuck[/q]
2 In your exegesis, this seems to be the turning point. Either the player seeks to cultivate an environment in which they can play at a higher standard, or they seek to go off the rails and "punish" the others for not providing it. 2 In your exegesis, this seems to be the turning point. Either the player seeks to cultivate an environment in which they can play at a higher standard, or they seek to go off the rails and "punish" the others for not providing it.
3 \n 3 \n
4 I would assume that a player who seeks to cultivate an environment with a higher standard of play would be a regular in the high-elo event room, but i don't think i've been observing that [url=http://zero-k.info/Battles?Title=Platinum&Map=&PlayersFrom=&PlayersTo=&Age=0&Mission=0&Bots=0&Rank=8&Victory=0&UserId=393678]here[/url] or [url=http://zero-k.info/Battles?Title=Palladium&Map=&PlayersFrom=&PlayersTo=&Age=0&Mission=0&Bots=0&Rank=8&Victory=0&UserId=393678]here[/url]. 4 I would assume that a player who seeks to cultivate an environment with a higher standard of play would be a regular in the high-elo event room, but i don't think i've been observing that [url=http://zero-k.info/Battles?Title=Platinum&Map=&PlayersFrom=&PlayersTo=&Age=0&Mission=0&Bots=0&Rank=8&Victory=0&UserId=393678]here[/url] or [url=http://zero-k.info/Battles?Title=Palladium&Map=&PlayersFrom=&PlayersTo=&Age=0&Mission=0&Bots=0&Rank=8&Victory=0&UserId=393678]here[/url].
5 \n 5 \n
6 Consequently, i don't even think that higher availability of the high-elo room would change things. I am also not certain that you could avoid the bad transition here by cultivating some culture of pursuit of higher play in opposition to the culture of "lel lobster cooked" - again, because that's readily within reach, but [i][u]one[/u] is not grasping[/i] for it. 6 Consequently, i don't even think that higher availability of the high-elo room would change things. I am also not certain that you could avoid the bad transition here by cultivating some culture of pursuit of higher play in opposition to the culture of "lel lobster cooked" - again, because that's readily within reach, but [i][u]one[/u] is not grasping[/i] for it.
7 \n 7 \n
8 Is there any experiment that you would stage to determine if this even works? Do you have any other intervention in mind? 8 Is there any experiment that you would stage to determine if this even works? Do you have any other intervention in mind?
9 \n 9 \n
10 [q]- feels as even more unimportant to you[/q] 10 [q]- feels as even more unimportant to you[/q]
11 [spoiler]At least that is easily cured by reciting the mantra [i]4 hate & devotion[/i][url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFUK9lHu5zU].[/url][/spoiler] 11 [spoiler]At least that is easily cured by reciting the mantra [i]4 hate & devotion[/i][url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFUK9lHu5zU].[/url][/spoiler]
12 \n 12 \n
13 [q]- for whatever reason (real-life, addiction to zk maybe) avoiding zk is not an option.[/q] 13 [q]- for whatever reason (real-life, addiction to zk maybe) avoiding zk is not an option.[/q]
14 This is called pathological use. Don't do it. 14 This is called pathological use. Don't do it.
15 \n 15 \n
16 Unfortunately, RTS is one of the genres that [url=https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/cyber.2015.0092]seems[/url] to be more susceptible to causing this. I would advocate that if you find yourself in such a situation, you actually need to figure out how to play less. 16 Unfortunately, RTS is one of the genres that [url=https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/cyber.2015.0092]seems[/url] to be more susceptible to causing this. I would advocate that if you find yourself in such a situation, you actually need to figure out how to play less.
17 \n 17 \n
18 If you feel like providing counseling to people who feel that their life is getting destroyed by their addiction to ZK, please do so. 18 If you feel like providing counseling to people who feel that their life is getting destroyed by their addiction to ZK, please do so.
19 \n 19 \n
20 Additionally, if someone really feels like they need to lay off the lobster to retain the goods in their real life ( cases such as exams, or work deadlines) , we do provide bans by request. 20 Additionally, if someone really feels like they need to lay off the lobster to retain the goods in their real life ( cases such as exams, or work deadlines) , we do provide bans by self-request.
21 \n 21 \n
22 However, this was not about one of those cases. 22 However, this was not about one of those cases.
23 \n 23 \n
24 [q]I don`t know about anything you or other admins communicated in private obviously. [/q] 24 [q]I don`t know about anything you or other admins communicated in private obviously. [/q]
25 Personally, i am neither qualified, nor do i get paid enough to provide free psychological counseling to everyone who plays a game that i sometimes contribute to in other ways for free. 25 Personally, i am neither qualified, nor do i get paid enough to provide free psychological counseling to everyone who plays a game that i sometimes contribute to in other ways for free.
26 \n 26 \n
27 It is wonderful that you seek to provide that service to the project. 27 It is wonderful that you seek to provide that service to the project.
28 \n 28 \n
29 I don't see what your conflict is though with following through with harsher measures if this fails (e.g. gets from the "feels upset about players who play worse than him" to "actively blows up ally units"). 29 I don't see what your conflict is though with following through with harsher measures if this fails (e.g. gets from the "feels upset about players who play worse than him" to "actively blows up ally units").
30 \n 30 \n
31 You keep saying that of course at this point mod action is necessary; but yet, this thread exists. 31 You keep saying that of course at this point mod action is necessary; but yet, this thread exists.
32 \n 32 \n
33 Could you clarify on this? 33 Could you clarify on this?