| 1 |
I think this is a reasonable argument to make about Bolas and the Archer/Venom reworks.
|
1 |
I think this is a reasonable argument to make about Bolas and the Archer/Venom reworks.
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
I would describe the problematic iterations of Blitz as "a raider that happens to have really good matchups against several other raiders" rather than as a riot per se. Duck has had this property at some points in time also.
|
3 |
I would describe the problematic iterations of Blitz as "a raider that happens to have really good matchups against several other raiders" rather than as a riot per se. Duck has had this property at some points in time also.
|
| 4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
| 5 |
Kodachi
is
weird.
|
5 |
Kodachi
is
weird,
and
has
pretty
much
always
been
weird.
|
| 6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
| 7 |
[quote]And I don't think I've even seen anyone complain about the raiders back then.[/quote]
|
7 |
[quote]And I don't think I've even seen anyone complain about the raiders back then.[/quote]
|
| 8 |
I think there were a few. Perhaps more influential was the feeling that 1v1 and small teams games were very often decided by early game raider interactions, and that those game modes would be more interesting if they explored other parts of the game more often.
|
8 |
I think there were a few. Perhaps more influential was the feeling that 1v1 and small teams games were very often decided by early game raider interactions, and that those game modes would be more interesting if they explored other parts of the game more often.
|
blitz/koda/bola/archer/venom and the advent of the riot/raiders