1 |
[quote]Ill tell you exactly what happens when team does not have air. It builds some AA and advances hard. [/quote] If map is (very) small the invested amount will be comparable to the air investment. If map is large, the fact that EVERYBODY in enemy team has to invest is quite a win. Also, you mention "enemy builds aa" and "enemy advances", that sounds quite wishful thinking. They could also start building chainsaw-s in base...
|
1 |
[quote]Ill tell you exactly what happens when team does not have air. It builds some AA and advances hard. [/quote] If map is (very) small the invested amount will be comparable to the air investment. If map is large, the fact that EVERYBODY in enemy team has to invest is quite a win. Also, you mention "enemy builds aa" and "enemy advances", that sounds quite wishful thinking. They could also start building chainsaw-s in base...
|
2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
3 |
Let
me
put
it
differently,
When
team
is
not
smart
enough
to
"build
aa"
and
"advance"
if
there
is
no
good
air
player
not
much
can
be
done
-
hard
to
help
people
across
the
map.
When
team
is
smart
enough
even
if
one
o
the
good
player
is
air,
they
will
win
as
air
investment
is
either
mirrored
or
AA
investment
by
multiple
teams
gives
an
econ
advantage
(
and
after
some
time
can
switch
from
air
anyhow)
.
|
3 |
Let
me
put
it
differently,
When
team
is
not
smart
enough
to
"build
aa"
and
"advance"
if
there
is
no
good
air
player
not
much
can
be
done
-
hard
to
help
people
across
the
map.
When
team
is
smart
enough
even
if
one
of
the
good
player
is
air,
they
will
win
as
air
investment
is
either
mirrored
or
AA
investment
by
multiple
teams
gives
an
econ
advantage
(
and
after
some
time
can
switch
from
air
anyhow)
.
|
4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
5 |
But I fully agree with you that more than one air is generally (unless 16v16 or so) not a valid investment.
|
5 |
But I fully agree with you that more than one air is generally (unless 16v16 or so) not a valid investment.
|