| 1 |
[q]I think value killed vs value lost graph normally shows the true picture better. Doing a lot of damage but losing everything in the process is much worse than doing slightly less damage but having very minimal loses[/q]
|
1 |
[q]I think value killed vs value lost graph normally shows the true picture better. Doing a lot of damage but losing everything in the process is much worse than doing slightly less damage but having very minimal loses[/q]
|
| 2 |
Impalers tend to embody the principle of contact-free warfare, never taking any risk and just shooting from a huge range away, so this metric would skew even higher towards their utility.
|
2 |
Impalers tend to embody the principle of contact-free warfare, never taking any risk and just shooting from a huge range away, so this metric would skew even higher towards their utility.
|
| 3 |
\n
|
3 |
\n
|
| 4 |
That said, the highest value killed / value lost in this game goes to the trollcom, so i'm not sure what to say. Perhaps this: the run-and-gun commander takes a *huge* risk every time it decloaks to do anything - unlike Impalers.
|
4 |
That said, the highest value killed / value lost in this game goes to the trollcom, so i'm not sure what to say. Perhaps this: the run-and-gun commander takes a *huge* risk every time it decloaks to do anything - unlike Impalers.
|
| 5 |
\n
|
5 |
\n
|
|
|
6 |
[q]tend to become pretty useless when the defences are dead[/q]
|
|
|
7 |
IME when they can no longer shoot at your military statics because they are dead, they tend to start going [i]countervalue[/i] - at your economy.
|
|
|
8 |
\n
|
| 6 |
[q]10k worth of impalers would have been better spent on say 2x Merlin, or a paladin to help push.[/q]
|
9 |
[q]10k worth of impalers would have been better spent on say 2x Merlin, or a paladin to help push.[/q]
|
| 7 |
There was a merlin. I remember it because i dgunned it.
|
10 |
There was a merlin. I remember it because i dgunned it.
|
| 8 |
\n
|
11 |
\n
|
B1089139 23 on LLTAComplexV2 (Multiplayer)