1 |
[q]Because looking back in history, most mumble players joined, before they were ranked so well.[/q]
|
1 |
[q]Because looking back in history, most mumble players joined, before they were ranked so well.[/q]
|
2 |
Unsure if this isn't regression to the mean. Most of the players eventually improve somewhat. Having playmates tends to accelerate the learning.
|
2 |
Unsure if this isn't regression to the mean. Most of the players eventually improve somewhat. Having playmates tends to accelerate the learning.
|
3 |
\n
|
3 |
\n
|
4 |
[q]A good indicator for this is that this type of players is typically weaker in 1v1 scenarios then in teamgames. Not saying they can't/haven't improved in this field later on. [/q]
|
4 |
[q]A good indicator for this is that this type of players is typically weaker in 1v1 scenarios then in teamgames. Not saying they can't/haven't improved in this field later on. [/q]
|
5 |
The list of typical players you listed kind of defeats this claim, at least for the latter two who i've had the honor of duelling.
|
5 |
The list of typical players you listed kind of defeats this claim, at least for the latter two who i've had the honor of duelling.
|
6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
7 |
This is perhaps easier to check though via comparing casual vs mm rating trends.
|
7 |
This is perhaps easier to check though via comparing casual vs mm rating trends.
|
|
|
8 |
\n
|
|
|
9 |
Here's yours:
|
|
|
10 |
\n
|
|
|
11 |
[spoiler][img]https://i.ibb.co/dt91zR5/image.png[/img]
|
|
|
12 |
\n
|
|
|
13 |
Dark red is casual, bright is MM.
|
|
|
14 |
\n
|
|
|
15 |
[/spoiler]
|