1 |
[quote]How is this different from an FPS player not enjoying aiming so programming something to aid him in this regard.[/quote]
|
1 |
[quote]How is this different from an FPS player not enjoying aiming so programming something to aid him in this regard.[/quote]
|
2 |
It is a black and white fact that aimbots are illegal in FPS communities. It is not a black and white fact that widgets which control units are illegal in this community.
|
2 |
It is a black and white fact that aimbots are illegal in FPS communities. It is not a black and white fact that widgets which control units are illegal in this community.
|
3 |
\n
|
3 |
\n
|
4 |
To be clear: I do not think the existence of this widget is good for Zero-K, or that it is acceptable for it to exist in the long term. I hope and expect it to be rendered technically infeasible in the near future. I think it is distasteful that somebody has used it in a ranked game without advertising its existence (note that this is discouraged, but not *explicitly* forbidden, by the Code of Conduct). I am, again, quite willing to retroactively mark this game as no-elo.
|
4 |
To be clear: I do not think the existence of this widget is good for Zero-K, or that it is acceptable for it to exist in the long term. I hope and expect it to be rendered technically infeasible in the near future. I think it is distasteful that somebody has used it in a ranked game without advertising its existence (note that this is discouraged, but not *explicitly* forbidden, by the Code of Conduct). I am, again, quite willing to retroactively mark this game as no-elo.
|
5 |
\n
|
5 |
\n
|
6 |
However, the bar for "this is so obviously against the rules that [b]any reasonable person[/b] should have known it in the absence of a specific admin statement and refrained from doing it, and therefore it is immediately bannable" is very high and I do not think this situation meets it.
|
6 |
However, the bar for "this is so obviously against the rules that [b]any reasonable person[/b] should have known it in the absence of a specific admin statement and refrained from doing it, and therefore it is immediately bannable" is very high and I do not think this situation meets it.
|
7 |
\n
|
7 |
\n
|
8 |
--
|
8 |
--
|
9 |
\n
|
9 |
\n
|
10 |
For
the
record
I
am
making
no
statement
one
way
or
the
other
on
whether
somebody
using
a
widget
like
this
again
in
the
time
between
now
and
when
it
is
rendered
infeasible
would
be
modactioned.
As
far
as
I
am
concerned
that
is
a
decision
for
@GoogleFrog
to
make.
|
10 |
For
the
record
I
am
making
no
statement
one
way
or
the
other
on
whether
somebody
using
a
widget
like
this
again
in
the
time
between
now
and
when
it
is
rendered
infeasible
would
be
modactioned.
As
far
as
I
am
concerned
that
is
a
policy
decision
for
@GoogleFrog
to
make
and
I
am
unaware
of
it
having
been
made
at
this
time.
|