| 1 |
@shin_getter that is an interesting post. I'm not sure what to say since, in the theoretical parts of the post, I tend to think one of the following:
|
1 |
@shin_getter that is an interesting post. I'm not sure what to say since, in the theoretical parts of the post, I tend to think one of the following:
|
| 2 |
* You're describing how ZK already works, so you seem to be solving solved problem, or
|
2 |
* You're describing how ZK already works, so you seem to be solving solved problem, or
|
| 3 |
*
There
are
good
reasons
why
ZK
shouldn't
or
can't
try
to
work
how
you
describe,
and
I
don't
se
the
solution
working.
|
3 |
*
There
are
good
reasons
why
ZK
shouldn't
or
can't
try
to
work
how
you
describe,
and
I
don't
see
the
solution
working.
|
| 4 |
Sometimes I consider the problems solved on the design level, but the balance isn't quite there. I still don't see the need for design level solutions.
|
4 |
Sometimes I consider the problems solved on the design level, but the balance isn't quite there. I still don't see the need for design level solutions.
|
| 5 |
\n
|
5 |
\n
|
| 6 |
In the practical parts of the post I tend to think one of:
|
6 |
In the practical parts of the post I tend to think one of:
|
| 7 |
* That unit/change sounds a bit too janky to work, or
|
7 |
* That unit/change sounds a bit too janky to work, or
|
| 8 |
* Anyone is free t o try to make a polished version of that unit idea.
|
8 |
* Anyone is free t o try to make a polished version of that unit idea.
|
| 9 |
\n
|
9 |
\n
|
| 10 |
Maybe I'll have to start with a rough list.
|
10 |
Maybe I'll have to start with a rough list.
|
Air v. AA v. Ground balance