| 1 |
[quote]If I were to design a second sea factory, I would at least consider splitting the existing ship units between the two new factories, and then adding new units to both to bring them up to feature-complete status. [/quote]
|
1 |
[quote]If I were to design a second sea factory, I would at least consider splitting the existing ship units between the two new factories, and then adding new units to both to bring them up to feature-complete status. [/quote]
|
| 2 |
Shipfact2 seems less fun than land-sea factories that work in multiple domains.
|
2 |
Shipfact2 seems less fun than land-sea factories that work in multiple domains.
|
| 3 |
\n
|
3 |
\n
|
| 4 |
And if one iterates:
|
4 |
And if one iterates:
|
| 5 |
Vehicle - Sea Surface (Hover)
|
5 |
Vehicle - Sea Surface (Hover)
|
| 6 |
Vehicle - Sea floor (amphtanks)
|
6 |
Vehicle - Sea floor (amphtanks)
|
| 7 |
Bots - Sea floor (amphbots)
|
7 |
Bots - Sea floor (amphbots)
|
| 8 |
Bots - Sea Surface (swimbots ? alligator/frog bots of doom!!!1?!!!!)
|
8 |
Bots - Sea Surface (swimbots ? alligator/frog bots of doom!!!1?!!!!)
|
| 9 |
\n
|
9 |
\n
|
| 10 |
Then there is spider/air/jump combo with sea, but that is really high on the gimmick scale.
|
10 |
Then there is spider/air/jump combo with sea, but that is really high on the gimmick scale.
|
| 11 |
\n
|
11 |
\n
|
| 12 |
As
for
ships,
didn't
the
old
very
expensive
ship
design
work
poorly
and
unit
costs
had
to
be
scaled
down?
Pure
heavy
facts
seems
hard
to
balance.
If
I
am
to
go
for
a
new
"thematic"
sea
only
factory
I'd
probably
go
for
hydrofoils/Catamarine/Trimaran
as
the
fast
sea
factory.
|
12 |
As
for
ships,
didn't
the
old
very
expensive
ship
design
work
poorly
and
unit
costs
had
to
be
scaled
down?
Pure
heavy
facts
seems
hard
to
balance.
If
I
am
to
go
for
a
new
"thematic"
sea
only
factory
I'd
probably
go
for
hydrofoils/Catamaran/Trimaran
as
the
fast
sea
factory.
|
Unlock the potential of SEA: a Pitch for new additions