1 |
@GoogleFrog - Thanks for the update. The cost increment seems a little small, but let's see what happens with this. I don't expect much at this level.
|
1 |
@GoogleFrog - Thanks for the update. The cost increment seems a little small, but let's see what happens with this. I don't expect much at this level.
|
2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
3 |
[q]No other shieldbot can deal damage to Lotus without retribution. Rogue outranges low range turrets because every factory should have a way to do this. [/q]
|
3 |
[q]No other shieldbot can deal damage to Lotus without retribution. Rogue outranges low range turrets because every factory should have a way to do this. [/q]
|
4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
5 |
That's
not
entirely
true.
Felon
toasts
them,
Racketeer
disables
them
and
Thug
honestly
loses
negligible
effect
from
dealing
with
them.
Porc
busting
is
not
shieldbot's
weakness,
though
I
will
concurr
that
recluse
is
(
thus
my
earlier
suggestion
of
a
lighter
weight
racketeer
on
par
with
recluse)
.
|
5 |
That's
not
entirely
true.
Felon
toasts
them,
Racketeer
disables
them
and
Thug
honestly
loses
negligible
effect
from
dealing
with
them.
Porc
busting
is
not
shieldbot's
weakness,
though
I
will
concur
that
recluse
is
(
thus
my
earlier
suggestion
of
a
lighter
weight
racketeer
on
par
with
recluse)
.
|
6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
7 |
However, if every factory should have a way to do this, why do moderator and scalpel stand under LLTs eating damage for days after their attacks? If the counterpoint is that lance and firewalker are the intended tools, then the arguement for rogue being the ranged element gets superceded by the existence of felon.
|
7 |
However, if every factory should have a way to do this, why do moderator and scalpel stand under LLTs eating damage for days after their attacks? If the counterpoint is that lance and firewalker are the intended tools, then the arguement for rogue being the ranged element gets superceded by the existence of felon.
|