| 1 |
I
appreciate
the
desire
to
not
publicly
name
names
re.
rating
manipulation
publicly,
but
it
is
difficult
for
the
admins
to
make
much
headway
unless
reports
are
submitted.
|
1 |
I
appreciate
the
desire
to
not
publicly
name
names
re.
rating
manipulation,
but
it
is
difficult
for
the
admins
to
make
much
headway
unless
reports
are
submitted.
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
[quote]The Balancer in teams often seems to overvalue the purple players within the team, believing they are equal to say 3-5 ~giants this in turn results in a 1v5 essentially due to the purples teammates being >giants, the fact a purple is the equivalent to multiple golds and plats is absurd and it just results in a lost game from the start[/quote]
|
3 |
[quote]The Balancer in teams often seems to overvalue the purple players within the team, believing they are equal to say 3-5 ~giants this in turn results in a 1v5 essentially due to the purples teammates being >giants, the fact a purple is the equivalent to multiple golds and plats is absurd and it just results in a lost game from the start[/quote]
|
| 4 |
Purple rated teams players, by definition, get and keep that colour by carrying games in which their teammates are typically weaker than the players on the other team. In some combinations of player distribution and map, this occasionally leads to pretty unwinnable games - but you might be surprised what some of the purple players are capable of carrying.
|
4 |
Purple rated teams players, by definition, get and keep that colour by carrying games in which their teammates are typically weaker than the players on the other team. In some combinations of player distribution and map, this occasionally leads to pretty unwinnable games - but you might be surprised what some of the purple players are capable of carrying.
|
Stacking in Teams and FFA