| 1 |
We are straying here from the intended purpose of the thread, but I'm not sure there is much to say beyond:
|
1 |
We are straying here from the intended purpose of the thread, but I'm not sure there is much to say beyond:
|
| 2 |
*
(
Continue
to)
report
clear
cases
of
deliberate
rating
manipulation.
Don't
bother
making
a
thread
about
each
one,
just
send
us
reports.
|
2 |
*
(
Continue
to)
report
clear
cases
of
deliberate
rating
manipulation.
Don't
bother
making
a
thread
about
each
one,
just
send
us
reports.
Making
some
kind
of
a
post
on
the
replay
so
it
stays
on
the
server
is
fine,
just
make
sure
you
send
a
report.
|
| 3 |
* The admins are aware there is a problem with FFA and we are considering our response. We have the capability to make our response retroactive if needed.
|
3 |
* The admins are aware there is a problem with FFA and we are considering our response. We have the capability to make our response retroactive if needed.
|
| 4 |
* Possibly there is also a problem with 1v1 in casual rating. There is certainly a problem with the no-elo 1v1 room losing its no-elo flag with some regularity. These matches should get unflagged for casual rating, but understand that this may take a while to propagate to people's actual ratings even when we get around to it.
|
4 |
* Possibly there is also a problem with 1v1 in casual rating. There is certainly a problem with the no-elo 1v1 room losing its no-elo flag with some regularity. These matches should get unflagged for casual rating, but understand that this may take a while to propagate to people's actual ratings even when we get around to it.
|
| 5 |
* It's not obvious what the solution to "friends choosing to group together with parties/clans, and having better results when they do" is. It's not even obvious that there is a problem to *be* solved.
|
5 |
* It's not obvious what the solution to "friends choosing to group together with parties/clans, and having better results when they do" is. It's not even obvious that there is a problem to *be* solved.
|
| 6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
| 7 |
[quote]If a purple gets into an tactical fight with high ranked blue they probably not really carry[/quote]
|
7 |
[quote]If a purple gets into an tactical fight with high ranked blue they probably not really carry[/quote]
|
| 8 |
Surely this depends on the purple a bit. There isn't that much difference in rating (sometimes none) between a low rated purple and a high rated blue, but the highest-rated purples have every chance of running circles around any blue (and for that matter, a lot of the purples), especially in smaller-size teams.
|
8 |
Surely this depends on the purple a bit. There isn't that much difference in rating (sometimes none) between a low rated purple and a high rated blue, but the highest-rated purples have every chance of running circles around any blue (and for that matter, a lot of the purples), especially in smaller-size teams.
|
| 9 |
\n
|
9 |
\n
|
| 10 |
Putting aside the players in a league of their own, I would characterise the difference between low-to-mid purples and a lot of strong blues as "versatility". It is typically very difficult to put a purple player entirely out of their comfort zone, or to predict what they will do in a way that enables you to strongly counter it. Some strong blues are quite versatile, and often if their execution improves a bit or they have a run of good luck they become purple pretty quickly.
|
10 |
Putting aside the players in a league of their own, I would characterise the difference between low-to-mid purples and a lot of strong blues as "versatility". It is typically very difficult to put a purple player entirely out of their comfort zone, or to predict what they will do in a way that enables you to strongly counter it. Some strong blues are quite versatile, and often if their execution improves a bit or they have a run of good luck they become purple pretty quickly.
|
Stacking in Teams and FFA