1 |
[quote]It would make it a hover, though, aka massively nerf shieldballs by diminishing their mobility. [/quote]
|
1 |
[quote]It would make it a hover, though, aka massively nerf shieldballs by diminishing their mobility. [/quote]
|
2 |
Technically you can give it a waterwalking bot movedef, which already exists for certain units like White Dragons. See BHOVER5 and BHOVER3.
|
2 |
Technically you can give it a waterwalking bot movedef, which already exists for certain units like White Dragons. See BHOVER5 and BHOVER3.
|
3 |
\n
|
3 |
\n
|
4 |
But
the
main
reason
why
mobile
shield
subs
[s]are
considered
"okay"[s]
still
exist
is
because
commanders
are
also
sub
units
that
can
have
shields.
I've
already
argued
at
length
before
that
commanders
having
shields
in
water
isn't
worth
it,
but
it
basically
seems
it
would
require
some
form
of
testing
for
this
argument
to
successfully
pass.
|
4 |
But
the
main
reason
why
mobile
shield
subs
[s]are
considered
"okay"[/s]
still
exist
is
because
commanders
are
also
sub
units
that
can
have
shields.
I've
already
argued
at
length
before
that
commanders
having
shields
in
water
isn't
worth
it,
but
it
basically
seems
it
would
require
some
form
of
testing
for
this
argument
to
successfully
pass.
|