Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

balancing of uneven teams

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
5/9/2012 3:33:28 PMUSrankCrazyEddie before revert after revert
Before After
1 Handicaps aren't unfair, they just make for a different game. In the same way that a team game and a 1v1 are different games, or a big map and a small map are different games. 1 Handicaps aren't unfair, they just make for a different game. In the same way that a team game and a 1v1 are different games, or a big map and a small map are different games.
2 \n 2 \n
3 Handicap games are inherently asymmetric, but that's not a flaw. Many very good games are asymmetric. 3 Handicap games are inherently asymmetric, but that's not a flaw. Many very good games are asymmetric.
4 \n 4 \n
5 Handicaps allow for games that are more interesting and fun for both sides, even when the two players or teams have very different skill levels. Handicap systems are a very, very good thing to have available as an option. The canonical example of an outstanding handicap system is Go, where you can easily play an evenly-matched game between to very unevenly-matched opponents. 5 Handicaps allow for games that are more interesting and fun for both sides, even when the two players or teams have very different skill levels. Handicap systems are a very, very good thing to have available as an option. The canonical example of an outstanding handicap system is Go, where you can easily play an evenly-matched game between two very unevenly-matched opponents.
6 \n 6 \n
7 Devising and testing a workable handicap system for Zero-K would give the game a valuable asset. 7 Devising and testing a workable handicap system for Zero-K would give the game a valuable asset.
8 \n 8 \n