Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

leavers

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
1/7/2023 7:29:31 AMDErankSnowlob before revert after revert
1/7/2023 7:21:51 AMDErankSnowlob before revert after revert
Before After
1 @gooseman Where do you draw the line? 1 @gooseman Where do you draw the line?
2 \n 2 \n
3 Personal Opinion about the Quoted Passage: 3 Personal Opinion about the Quoted Passage:
4 " "Pursuing all-or-nothing strategies" - Hows that defined? Nux rush i guess, what else? 4 " "Pursuing all-or-nothing strategies" - Hows that defined? Nux rush i guess, what else?
5 "without the consent of your team," - what is "your team"? 50%+1? 50% of those who actually participate in chat? else impossible to follow -> gets ignored. Pala rush? When only 5/16 Players help does that count as "consent"? 5 "without the consent of your team," - what is "your team"? 50%+1? 50% of those who actually participate in chat? else impossible to follow -> gets ignored. Pala rush? When only 5/16 Players help does that count as "consent"?
6 "or resigning on your own because you faced an early minor setback," - what is a "minor setback"? Is loseing entire Army (80% of total Value owned) still considered "minor" since fac and com are still alive? 6 "or resigning on your own because you faced an early minor setback," - what is a "minor setback"? Is loseing entire Army (80% of total Value owned) still considered "minor" since fac and com are still alive?
7 "is disrespectful to your teammates." - respect needs to be earned, recognition/esteem can be demanded -> gets ignored. 7 "is disrespectful to your teammates." - respect needs to be earned, recognition/esteem can be demanded -> gets ignored.
8 " A pattern of such behavior may result in moderator action," - that would require the definition of a measurement on which basis "moderator actions" are taken. Rarely ever witnessed any, my guess is the mods dont know themselfes whats ok and when it crosses the line. I think more communication could often do wonders without the need of any authority. 8 " A pattern of such behavior may result in moderator action," - that would require the definition of a measurement on which basis "moderator actions" are taken. Rarely ever witnessed any, my guess is the mods dont know themselfes whats ok and when it crosses the line. I think more communication could often do wonders without the need of any authority.
9 "may result" - only "is going to result" if the mods sex with his partner last night was bad or what? I dislike such injustice/unequality inviteing passages. 9 "may result" - only "is going to result" if the mods sex last night was bad or what? I dislike such injustice/unequality inviteing passages.
10 "and in any case you will be damaging your own reputation in the community." - what reputation? 10 "and in any case you will be damaging your own reputation in the community." - what reputation?
11 \n 11 \n
12 \n 12 \n
13 Personal Opinion about your Statement: 13 Personal Opinion about your Statement:
14 "Some simply resign early" - noobs look at colours, pros look at names&symbols. If theres a big imbalance of "average+" names a early resign is justified in my opinion. Theres even purples that are beasts 1vs1 but are egoistic noobs in lobpot. Why fight when you cant win? Id rather spend the time takeing my chances in the next game than spending looong time slowly dying. 14 "Some simply resign early" - noobs look at colours, pros look at names&symbols. If theres a big imbalance of "average+" names a early resign is justified in my opinion. Theres even purples that are beasts 1vs1 but are egoistic noobs in lobpot. Why fight when you cant win? Id rather spend the time takeing my chances in the next game than spending looong time slowly dying.
15 " others resign after their, " - logic result. 15 " others resign after their, " - logic result.
16 "frankly, stupid strategies predictably fail" - was this pointed out to them before? 16 "frankly, stupid strategies predictably fail" - was this pointed out to them before?
17 "or their commander dies" - their own fault. 17 "or their commander dies" - their own fault.
18 "or something similar." - understandable but often salvageable. 18 "or something similar." - understandable but often salvageable.
19 " It wouldn't be so bad if it were just low-rank players," but I've seen at least 3 blues do that" - id recomend throwing that line of thought out of the window. Youre forceing players into a role with it. Also whats "low rank" for you? colour or level? In my experience everything below like level 40 resigns last. Were the games where they resigned won or lost afterwards? Theres often a "point of no return", many games are decided by 1 action of 1 player. 19 " It wouldn't be so bad if it were just low-rank players," but I've seen at least 3 blues do that" - id recomend throwing that line of thought out of the window. Youre forceing players into a role with it. Also whats "low rank" for you? colour or level? In my experience everything below like level 40 resigns last. Were the games where they resigned won or lost afterwards? Theres often a "point of no return", many games are decided by 1 action of 1 player.
20 \n 20 \n
21 Since your initial post is more a question im keen on hearing your position. About the many questions id like to establish a baseline first so were talking about the same thing. Feel free to also copy paste quote me so its known what youre refering too. 21 Since your initial post is more a question im keen on hearing your position. About the many questions id like to establish a baseline first so were talking about the same thing. Feel free to also copy paste quote me so its known what youre refering too.