Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

leavers

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
1/7/2023 10:52:52 PMRUrankgooseman before revert after revert
Before After
1 [quote] noobs look at colours, pros look at names&symbols [/quote] 1 [quote] noobs look at colours, pros look at names&symbols [/quote]
2 [quote]" It wouldn't be so bad if it were just low-rank players," but I've seen at least 3 blues do that" - id recomend throwing that line of thought out of the window. Youre forceing players into a role with it. [/quote] 2 [quote]" It wouldn't be so bad if it were just low-rank players," but I've seen at least 3 blues do that" - id recomend throwing that line of thought out of the window. Youre forceing players into a role with it. [/quote]
3 I know ranks aren't as telling of someone's skill, and I think that is sort of the issue here. I'm not throwing anyone into a role. There is already a role. And there's something else that looks at colors, other than the players. The balancer. If there's 2 blues it will put them in 2 different teams. But it doesn't seem to know that one of the blues consistently throws and ragequits, while the other doesn't. This also applies to all other ranks. [u][b]THIS is my main issue with them[/b][/u]. It seems to overrate some players, creating very uneven matches. 3 I know ranks aren't as telling of someone's skill, and I think that is sort of the issue here. I'm not throwing anyone into a role. There is already a role. And there's something else that looks at colors, other than the players. The balancer. If there's 2 blues it will put them in 2 different teams. But it doesn't seem to know that one of the blues consistently throws and ragequits, while the other doesn't. This also applies to all other ranks. [u][b]THIS is my main issue with them[/b][/u]. It seems to overrate some players, creating very uneven matches.
4 [quote]"frankly, stupid strategies predictably fail" - was this pointed out to them before?[/quote] 4 [quote]"frankly, stupid strategies predictably fail" - was this pointed out to them before?[/quote]
5 [quote]Besides the reporting, I think it always helps if you would just voice your opinion on the risky strategies. [/quote] 5 [quote]Besides the reporting, I think it always helps if you would just voice your opinion on the risky strategies. [/quote]
6 Can't watch every player at all times, they rarely tell you what they're doing either. Some lobs repeat the same mistakes over and over. 6 Can't watch every player at all times, they rarely tell you what they're doing either. Some lobs repeat the same mistakes over and over.
7 [quote]Were the games where they resigned won or lost afterwards? [/quote] 7 [quote]Were the games where they resigned won or lost afterwards? [/quote]
8 Nearly always lost. Was it their fault? Depends on the player, the match, etc. Criteria for that would be something like: 8 Nearly always lost. Was it their fault? Depends on the player, the match, etc. Criteria for that would be something like:
9 * How risky their strategy was, and how well-informed and consenting their team was regarding it, as covered by CoC 9 * How risky their strategy was, and how well-informed and consenting their team was regarding it, as covered by CoC
10 * How early they resign / how long the game goes on afterwards 10 * How early they resign / how long the game goes on afterwards
11 * Frequency 11 * Frequency
12 \n 12 \n
13 [quote]all nothing strategies are amazingly effective when they work... you don't report the successes only the failures? just because "you" can't manage it does not mean it never, or even rarely works.[/quote] 13 [quote]all nothing strategies are amazingly effective when they work... you don't report the successes only the failures? just because "you" can't manage it does not mean it never, or even rarely works.[/quote]
14 It's not about the strategy, it's about teamplay. If you do something risky or stupid, but your team approved it, it's now the team's fault if they lose, not yours specifically. 14 It's not about the strategy, it's about teamplay. If you do something risky or stupid, but your team approved it, it's now the team's fault if they lose, not yours specifically.
15 @B1535601 15 @B1535601
16 \n
17 [quote]The line is defined in large part by people sending reports.[/quote]
18 So, the answer is to just report people?