Post edit history
Game says caretaker is most efficient - what about plates?
| Before | After | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Caretakers are still better than plates because you don't have metal sitting on the plate in the form of nanoframes | 1 | Caretakers are still better than plates because you don't have metal sitting on the plate in the form of nanoframes |
| 2 | you can think of the metal of the nanoframe on the plate as being wasted by the plate and just add it onto the plate's cost | 2 | you can think of the metal of the nanoframe on the plate as being wasted by the plate and just add it onto the plate's cost |
| 3 | thus, if you're building anything that's not fleas, it's better to just spam caretakers ( ignoring the time it takes for a fac to start a new unit, but that's usually a lot smaller than the nanoframe cost) | 3 | thus, if you're building anything that's not fleas, it's better to just spam caretakers ( ignoring the time it takes for a fac to start a new unit, but that's usually a lot smaller than the nanoframe cost unless you have FFA income, at which point you shouldn't be using non-strider facs anyways) |