| 1 |
not exactly true. eco payback is not constant and goes first to the builder. reasoning behind this, is payback for the investment of the eco building.
|
1 |
not exactly true. eco payback is not constant and goes first to the builder. reasoning behind this, is payback for the investment of the eco building.
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
after
some
time,
this
shifts
to
be
distributed
to
the
whole
team
equally.
so
in
the
end,
the
eco
builder
gets
some
150%?
of
the
initial
invest
in
total,
before
the
equal
wealth
distribution
kick
in.
the
number
150%
is
just
guessed,
look
it
up
in
the
code
or
the
corresponding
forum
discussion.
|
3 |
after
some
time,
this
shifts
to
be
distributed
to
the
whole
team
equally.
so
in
the
end,
the
eco
builder
gets
some
[s]150%[/s]
60%?
of
the
initial
invest
in
total,
before
the
equal
wealth
distribution
kick
in.
[s]the
number
150%
is
just
guessed,
look
it
up
in
the
code
or
the
corresponding
forum
discussion.
[/s]
it
is
@GoogleFrog
confirmed
60%
|
| 4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
| 5 |
###
|
5 |
###
|
| 6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
| 7 |
note: back in the day before this was changed to the current state, it was WAY MORE EXPOTENTIAL for the eco guy. like reinvesting halves each singu. insane efficient and selfish, draining the own team dry.
|
7 |
note: back in the day before this was changed to the current state, it was WAY MORE EXPOTENTIAL for the eco guy. like reinvesting halves each singu. insane efficient and selfish, draining the own team dry.
|
over eco pay back