| 1 |
[quote]FFA isn't something that can be balanced.[/quote]
|
1 |
[quote]FFA isn't something that can be balanced.[/quote]
|
| 2 |
I
think
this
is
missing
the
point
of
the
thread.
I
don't
think
anybody
is
asking
for
a
balanced
game,
they're
asking
for
their
FFA
games
to
be
[b]fun[/b]
-
and
in
particular,
that
there
not
be
an
entire
day
of
FFA
games
that
are
all
unfun
[b]for
the
same
reason[/b],
and
because
of
the
same
people.
|
2 |
I
think
this
is
missing
the
point
of
the
thread.
I
don't
think
anybody
is
asking
for
a
balanced
game,
they're
asking
for
their
FFA
games
to
be
[b]fun[/b]
-
and
in
particular,
that
there
not
be
an
entire
day
of
FFA
games
that
are
all
unfun
[b]for
the
same
reason[/b],
and
because
the
same
people
are
making
the
same
unfun
decision
game
after
game.
|
| 3 |
\n
|
3 |
\n
|
| 4 |
[quote]ganging up on the "best" player is always the rational strategy.[/quote]
|
4 |
[quote]ganging up on the "best" player is always the rational strategy.[/quote]
|
| 5 |
I think that is an oversimplification.
|
5 |
I think that is an oversimplification.
|
| 6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
| 7 |
[quote]FFA is more about diplomacy than game knowledge. this is true of basically any RTS.[/quote]
|
7 |
[quote]FFA is more about diplomacy than game knowledge. this is true of basically any RTS.[/quote]
|
| 8 |
I think I disagree with this too. You don't have to be the strongest player in the room, but you do have to be competent enough to hold your own in a 1v1 - otherwise, you will just get eaten by a strong player early on, or if you do survive to lategame you won't win the final showdown.
|
8 |
I think I disagree with this too. You don't have to be the strongest player in the room, but you do have to be competent enough to hold your own in a 1v1 - otherwise, you will just get eaten by a strong player early on, or if you do survive to lategame you won't win the final showdown.
|
Atostic and Headkef ruining FFA games