1 |
To me the issue seems to be a couple at-odds things:
|
1 |
To me the issue seems to be a couple at-odds things:
|
2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
3 |
- It's technosolutionism to a cultural problem.
|
3 |
- It's technosolutionism to a cultural problem.
|
4 |
- It's exceptionally jarring and made more-so by how infrequently it happens.
|
4 |
- It's exceptionally jarring and made more-so by how infrequently it happens.
|
5 |
\n
|
5 |
\n
|
6 |
In
my
experience,
that
sort
of
solutionism
leads
to
a
general
feeling
of
"eh
I'm
good
today".
|
6 |
In
my
experience,
that
sort
of
solutionism
leads
to
a
general
feeling
of
"eh
I'm
good
today".
A
headsup
or
volunteer
pool
could
be
nice
to
avoid
those
feelings.
|
7 |
\n
|
7 |
\n
|
8 |
If
the
goal
is
to
improve
player
experience,
while
maybe
even
building
towards
an
improved
framework
for
a
better
implementation
of
this
splitting
--
why
not
fix
the
voting
system
so
that
we
can
have
multiple
votes
at
the
same
time?
I'm
only
suggesting
this
because
it
feels
like
a
lot
of
time,
energy,
and
thought
has
gone
into
something
that's
so
infrequent
while
this
glaring
issue
has
persisted
for
so
long.
|
8 |
But
if
the
goal
is
to
improve
player
experience,
while
maybe
even
building
towards
an
improved
framework
for
a
better
implementation
of
this
splitting
--
why
not
fix
the
voting
system
so
that
we
can
have
multiple
votes
at
the
same
time?
I'm
only
suggesting
this
because
it
feels
like
a
lot
of
time,
energy,
and
thought
has
gone
into
something
that's
so
infrequent
while
this
glaring
issue
has
persisted
for
so
long.
|
9 |
\n
|
9 |
\n
|
10 |
To be clear, I'm suggesting this as someone who does a ton of free work all the time out of principle. Loud randos telling you you're not working on the right thing is pissingly awful. But I hope you can appreciate the suggestion.
|
10 |
To be clear, I'm suggesting this as someone who does a ton of free work all the time out of principle. Loud randos telling you you're not working on the right thing is pissingly awful. But I hope you can appreciate the suggestion.
|