Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

Please turn off split command or make it a vote.

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
5/19/2024 8:29:15 PMDErankBrackman before revert after revert
Before After
1 If the split only happens at game start and only if there are >= 44 players, this does still not solve the problem of unnecessarily long waiting times. Most of the time, a big team game is running and it is practically impossible to start another one during this time because everybody only joins that running game. 1 If the split only happens at game start and only if there are >= 44 players, this does still not solve the problem of unnecessarily long waiting times. Most of the time, a big team game is running and it is practically impossible to start another one during this time because everybody only joins that running game.
2 \n 2 \n
3 [b]A waiting list of a running room should simply not exist. Then, people would join another room instead. It should only be possible to join a running room to spectate it or if you are actually playing in it. [/b] 3 [color=green][b]A waiting list of a running room should simply not exist. Then, people would join another room instead. It should only be possible to join a running room to spectate it or if you are actually playing in it. [/b][/color]
4 \n 4 \n
5 Additionally, when a non-password-protected team game ends, its players could be moved to the largest non-running non-password-protected teams room so that being in this room ensures to get in the next game. But this is not even necessary. 5 Additionally, when a non-password-protected team game ends, its players could be moved to the largest non-running non-password-protected teams room so that being in this room ensures to get in the next game. But this is not even necessary.