| 1 | @Aquanim | 1 | @Aquanim | 
                
                    | 2 | this set up was advantagous to ettin | 2 | this set up was advantagous to ettin | 
                
                    | 3 | \n | 3 | \n | 
                
                    | 4 | in fact since the AA builder have to take ground as well [pure AA doesn't hold ground either] you would have less AA than the air player have magpie, skewing the advantage to magpie player instead of parity as demonstrated here. | 4 | in fact since the AA builder have to take ground as well [pure AA doesn't hold ground either] you would have less AA than the air player have magpie, skewing the advantage to magpie player instead of parity as demonstrated here. | 
                
                    | 5 | \n | 5 | \n | 
                
                    | 6 | to address ettin repair 4 magpie kill 1 ettin outright, so each pass the result would be largely the same | 6 | to address ettin repair 4 magpie kill 1 ettin outright, so each pass the result would be largely the same | 
                
                    | 7 | \n | 7 | \n | 
                
                    | 8 | 4 ettins have to be together to make cost and can only cover a specific area so the same amount of magpie can force a multiple of AA metal built if the front is large enough. If air player force 2-3x their metal share in their opponent to build AA and also score kills, then when ground lose to inferior force, it's not the air player fault. | 8 | 4 ettins have to be together to make cost and can only cover a specific area so the same amount of magpie can force a multiple of AA metal built if the front is large enough. If air player force 2-3x their metal share in their opponent to build AA and also score kills, then when ground lose to inferior force, it's not the air player fault. | 
                
                    | 9 | \n | 9 | \n | 
                
                    | 10 | \n | 10 | \n | 
                
                    | 11 | Magpie priority target to me and I expect other as well was almost alway AA, so AA first then the rest | 11 | Magpie priority target to me and I expect other as well was almost alway AA, so AA first then the rest | 
                
                    | 12 | \n | 12 | \n | 
                
                    | 13 | given move attack command, ettin do automatically retreat a bit, not as good as manual control of course but then you are forcing the oponent to lose more APM than you [air player can just shift queue the attack] | 13 | given move attack command, ettin do automatically retreat a bit, not as good as manual control of course but then you are forcing the oponent to lose more APM than you [air player can just shift queue the attack] | 
                
                    | 14 | \n | 14 | \n | 
                
                    | 15 | in comparision | 15 | in comparision | 
                
                    | 16 | \n | 16 | \n | 
                
                    | 17 | 1 likho vs 4 ettin end with likho dead and 2 ettins down even if ettin is relatively clumbed up [almost to a point] [which they rarely are] and ettin is AoE AA so it should have been better against magpie than it is against Likho | 17 | 1 likho vs 4 ettin end with likho dead and 2 ettins down even if ettin is relatively clumbed up [almost to a point] [which they rarely are] and ettin is AoE AA so it should have been better against magpie than it is against Likho | 
                
                    | 18 | \n | 18 | \n | 
                
                    | 19 | 1 odin is killed by 3 ettin in 10-13 secs and ettins can respond better to odin due to their speed | 19 | 1 odin is killed by 3 ettin in 10-13 secs and ettins can respond better to odin due to their speed | 
                
                    | 20 | \n | 20 | \n | 
                
                    | 21 | \n | 21 | \n | 
                
                    | 22 | if your answer to magpie dominance is that the defender should have had more metal in shield and cloaker then I think it is high time to nerf magpie | 22 | if your answer to magpie dominance is that the defender should have had more metal in shield and cloaker then I think it is high time to nerf magpie | 
                
                    | 23 | \n | 23 | \n | 
                
                    | 24 | \n | 24 | \n | 
                
                    | 25 | My problem is not that nothing can kill magpie, my argument is that it is too good for its cost. I am not addressing the E cost in this analysis and I admit this is a major weakness . | 25 | My problem is not that nothing can kill magpie, my argument is that it is too good for its cost. I am not addressing the E cost in this analysis and I admit this is a major weakness . | 
                
                    | 26 | \n | 26 | \n | 
                
                    | 27 | I am advocating for a minor nerf to HP making it closer to raven in term of hp per metal or a buff to AA AoE | 27 | I am advocating for a minor nerf to HP making it closer to raven in term of hp per metal or a buff to AA AoE | 
                
                    | 28 | \n | 28 | \n | 
                
                    | 29 | It would also be good for my morale if you publicly admit that 2 ettins were not "sufficient to shutdown all magpies" as I recall you said. | 29 | It would also be good for my morale if you publicly admit that 2 ettins were not "sufficient to shutdown all magpies" as I recall you said. | 
                
                    | 30 | \n | 30 | \n | 
                
                    |  |  | 31 | specifically you said: " he [the enemy] only needs two [ettins] to delete you [Sortale] from the game" | 
                
                    |  |  | 32 | \n | 
                
                    | 31 | \n | 33 | \n |