1 |
[q]Half of the current top50 would vanish despite being active. The ladder would become completely inaccurate, showing only a fraction of the players.[/q]
|
1 |
[q]Half of the current top50 would vanish despite being active. The ladder would become completely inaccurate, showing only a fraction of the players.[/q]
|
2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
3 |
Is
this
in
reference
to
the
casual
ladder?
If
so
keep
in
mind
that
my
suggestion
is
for
the
Matchmacking
ladder.
|
3 |
Is
this
in
reference
to
the
casual
ladder?
If
so
keep
in
mind
that
my
suggestion
is
for
the
Matchmaking
ladder.
|
4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
5 |
I'd posit that the casual ladder is already, on some level, quite inaccurate and nebulous due to the wide array of games and game sizes that it encompasses. My own casual rating is a prime example of this issue - I really have no talent or taste for large teamgames, but have a massively inflated casual rating due to FFA successes. I don't feel comfortable or as though I deserve to retain my spot on that ladder as it is, but I don't really have a lot of incentive or opportunities to go back to FFA. Should I, like others, forever keep other more experienced casual ladder players down as a result of not passing off my rating and taking their rightful spot?
|
5 |
I'd posit that the casual ladder is already, on some level, quite inaccurate and nebulous due to the wide array of games and game sizes that it encompasses. My own casual rating is a prime example of this issue - I really have no talent or taste for large teamgames, but have a massively inflated casual rating due to FFA successes. I don't feel comfortable or as though I deserve to retain my spot on that ladder as it is, but I don't really have a lot of incentive or opportunities to go back to FFA. Should I, like others, forever keep other more experienced casual ladder players down as a result of not passing off my rating and taking their rightful spot?
|
6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
7 |
As @Stuart98 rightfully clarifies, the numbers could so easily be adjusted to something that would feel right.
|
7 |
As @Stuart98 rightfully clarifies, the numbers could so easily be adjusted to something that would feel right.
|