| 1 |
[q]He spent 2/3 of the stream vs an inactive AI, just toying with units and trying to understand economy. [/q]
|
1 |
[q]He spent 2/3 of the stream vs an inactive AI, just toying with units and trying to understand economy. [/q]
|
| 2 |
The playing is part of the payoff of the understanding, and the ability to play is evidence of there being something worth understanding. So I think @SnuggleBass's comment stands. So what we need is unchanged: someone has to step up and really push a marketing effort.
|
2 |
The playing is part of the payoff of the understanding, and the ability to play is evidence of there being something worth understanding. So I think @SnuggleBass's comment stands. So what we need is unchanged: someone has to step up and really push a marketing effort.
|
| 3 |
\n
|
3 |
\n
|
| 4 |
Maybe this happens after someone steps up and pushes a basic graphics update. Not a highly-skilled graphics update, just a bunch of actual work. Cataloguing maps and BAR shaders, tweaking lighting configs and defaults. Curating existing tech and capabilities.
|
4 |
Maybe this happens after someone steps up and pushes a basic graphics update. Not a highly-skilled graphics update, just a bunch of actual work. Cataloguing maps and BAR shaders, tweaking lighting configs and defaults. Curating existing tech and capabilities.
|
|
|
5 |
\n
|
|
|
6 |
I watched snippets of the game at the end and it mostly just reminded me of BA: units and tactics being rendered irrelevant by economy scaling and whatever has the most range.
|
BAR got Day9 to play