Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

About Nuke And AntiNuke

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
5/7/2026 3:35:30 PMINrankTheWarning before revert after revert
Before After
1 I think the main problem here is that Anti-nukes are expensive and have low range. This leads to needing anti-nukes every time you push. Also one anti-nuke isn't sufficient, you need atleast one or 2 more as backup. This means, effectively, we need more cost in anti's than the nuke. 1 I think the main problem here is that Anti-nukes are expensive and have low range. This leads to needing more anti-nukes every time you push. Also one anti-nuke isn't sufficient, you need atleast one or 2 more as backup. This means, effectively, we need more cost in anti's than the nuke.
2 \n 2 \n
3 So anti-nukes being cheaper and/or having more range could solve this problem as it would result in being able to cover a large range with lower costs. 3 So anti-nukes being cheaper and/or having more range could solve this problem as it would result in being able to cover a large range with lower costs.
4 \n 4 \n
5 Also perhaps nuke cost could be increased, given it's devastating impact. 5 Also perhaps nuke cost could be increased, given it's devastating impact.
6 \n 6 \n