| 1 |
I guess I'm trying to say that "lone wolf ffa" is not humanly possible, simply because we're not CAI. We can see beyond simple numbers. If we're in a FFA, I am aware of who you are and what I think my chances are against you. Even if I didn't mean to, I will take the chance to jump on you directly or not jump on a neighbor that is targeting you if either serve my purpose.
|
1 |
I guess I'm trying to say that "lone wolf ffa" is not humanly possible, simply because we're not CAI. We can see beyond simple numbers. If we're in a FFA, I am aware of who you are and what I think my chances are against you. Even if I didn't mean to, I will take the chance to jump on you directly or not jump on a neighbor that is targeting you if either serve my purpose.
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
CAI
on
the
other
hand
is
the
only
true
lone
wolf
and
they
just
attack
what
they
think
is
the
weakest
position.
In
fact,
CAI
specifically
is
what
board
game
players
swould
call
kingmaker.
All
the
participants
gang
on
the
weakest,
one
is
made
strong
in
the
process
who
is
then
further
not
targeted
by
the
remaining
participants.
The
stronger
the
king
becomes,
the
less
he
is
targeted
and
the
more
others
fight
among
themselves.
I
don't
think
players
would
ever
behave
this
way
unless
they
lack
so
much
information
they
effectively
play
blind
to
anything
but
their
direct
neighbors
(
see
ramparts)
.
|
3 |
CAI
on
the
other
hand
is
the
only
true
lone
wolf
and
they
just
attack
what
they
think
is
the
weakest
position.
In
fact,
CAI
specifically
is
what
board
game
players
would
call
kingmaker.
All
the
participants
gang
on
the
weakest,
one
is
made
strong
in
the
process
who
is
then
further
not
targeted
by
the
remaining
participants.
The
stronger
the
king
becomes,
the
less
he
is
targeted
and
the
more
others
fight
among
themselves.
I
don't
think
players
would
ever
behave
this
way
unless
they
lack
so
much
information
they
effectively
play
blind
to
anything
but
their
direct
neighbors
(
see
ramparts)
.
|
| 4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
| 5 |
I
guess
what
I'm
really
saying
is
I,
even
if
unintentional,
play
diplomacy.
I
just
prefer
to
engage
in
it
as
little
as
possible
and
don't
wish
for
any
system
to
be
added
on
top
of
it.
|
5 |
I
guess
what
I'm
really
saying
is
I,
even
if
unintentionally,
play
diplomacy.
I
just
prefer
to
engage
in
it
as
little
as
possible
and
don't
wish
for
any
system
to
be
added
on
top
of
it.
|
| 6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
| 7 |
I think fully muting a FFA match plays to kingmaker. If you can't truthfully declare a player controls significantly more resources than the pack, you end up acting like CAI. The only way to not play kingmaker is to make sure all players have as much vision as possible at all times and make rational decisions.
|
7 |
I think fully muting a FFA match plays to kingmaker. If you can't truthfully declare a player controls significantly more resources than the pack, you end up acting like CAI. The only way to not play kingmaker is to make sure all players have as much vision as possible at all times and make rational decisions.
|