Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

Zero-K v1.0.9.7

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
9/9/2012 6:32:25 PMDErankKlon before revert after revert
9/9/2012 6:31:37 PMDErankKlon before revert after revert
9/9/2012 6:29:50 PMDErankKlon before revert after revert
9/9/2012 6:29:21 PMDErankKlon before revert after revert
Before After
1 i can understand any argumentation that says its a bad thing that you cant defend against it properly. i even agree to that point to some degree. partly this is only because people simply dont know how to counter it, partly because there are no easy counters for it. most other counters to things are really easy, here all methods of countering are either complicated or tedious, like surrounding your singu with nanoframes or cheap buildings. but it is not impossible. it is, however already a strategy that is tedious to employ. you should count that in the consideration if its op or not. it required micro and continuous attention. 1 i can understand any argumentation that says its a bad thing that you cant defend against it properly. i even agree to that point to some degree. partly this is only because people simply dont know how to counter it, partly because there are no easy counters for it. most other counters to things are really easy, here all methods of countering are either complicated or tedious, like surrounding your singu with nanoframes or cheap buildings. but it is not impossible. it is, however already a strategy that is tedious to employ. you should count that in the consideration if its op or not. it required micro and continuous attention.
2 \n 2 \n
3 but heres my point, i already have given 2 ideas above to keep it in the game and have it be viable, but both more difficult to pull off as well as less reliable. i think both ideas are good and effectiv, yet they dont destroy the whole thing. making it impossible for skuttles to use their "jets" in air destroy the skuttle/ramp mechanic entirely. 3 but heres my point, i already have given 2 ideas above to keep it in the game and have it be viable, but both more difficult to pull off as well as less reliable. i think both ideas are good and effective, yet they dont destroy the whole thing. making it impossible for skuttles to use their "jets" in air destroy the skuttle/ramp mechanic entirely.
4 \n 4 \n
5 @CrazyEddie i think its an awesome gameplay element. your argumentation is basically "if its funny and ingenious, it better be entirely useless, or it has no place in competetive game". i find this a ridiculous point of view. BECAUSE it is funny and ingenious, it MUST be viable. otherwise you can just leave it out of the game, because everybody who is doing it is only hurting himself. you should be rewarded for doing a funny and ingenious thing, in any game, and not punished. and making a ramp for your skuttles is one of the most fun and ingenious ideas ever seen in a game. we should be proud of having that thing in the game we all play, not treat it as our stepchild. 5 @CrazyEddie i think its an awesome gameplay element. your argumentation is basically "if its funny and ingenious, it better be entirely useless, or it has no place in competetive game". i find this a ridiculous point of view. BECAUSE it is funny and ingenious, it MUST be viable. otherwise you can just leave it out of the game, because everybody who is doing it is only hurting himself. you should be rewarded for doing a funny and ingenious thing, in any game, and not punished. and making a ramp for your skuttles is one of the most fun and ingenious ideas ever seen in a game. we should be proud of having that thing in the game we all play, not treat it as our stepchild.