Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

Action at a distance, and why it's bad.

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
10/28/2012 8:01:55 AMAUrankAdminSaktoth before revert after revert
Before After
1 As google pointed out the resource system (except OD) violates this. The Djinn is even BP-based for the time it takes to transport something. So it is basically a high BP reclaimer-rebuilder. 1 As google pointed out the resource system (except OD) violates this. The Djinn is even BP-based for the time it takes to transport something. So it is basically a high BP reclaimer-rebuilder.
2 \n 2 \n
3 I don't like the Domi either but that has nothing to do with it. More the fact it does a damage type which only stacks with it's own damage type, and it's skirmisher mechanics. 3 I don't like the Domi either but that has nothing to do with it. More the fact it does a damage type which only stacks with it's own damage type, and it's skirmisher mechanics.
4 \n
5 Also I'm going to put on my philosopher of science hat and say firstly your characterization of action at a distance is totally wrong, it is so wrong it is basically Cartesian. Even Newton used action at a distance (Gravity, and doing away with 'Subtle Fluids' and Aethers). Under current physics there is nothing BUT action at a distance (IE elementary particles are so small that they never physically touch and interact entirely via fields of force that they generate).
6 \n