| 1 |
Are you sure? I'd assume that's just an instant elo loss, but i'd like to be proven wrong. And for 2v3 (which is hardly ever balanced) i don't expect this to work either.
|
1 |
Are you sure? I'd assume that's just an instant elo loss, but i'd like to be proven wrong. And for 2v3 (which is hardly ever balanced) i don't expect this to work either.
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
Still doesn't fix the horribly weird elo wins/losses from those games.
|
3 |
Still doesn't fix the horribly weird elo wins/losses from those games.
|
| 4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
| 5 |
Edit: Well i can't say that i agree with this method... It's not like the newb should be "punished" for losing like this. To elaborate what i mean with "punished": Elo should describe skill in some way. The one who played worse than what his elo suggests is not the 1400 elo newb but the 1800 veteran.
|
5 |
Edit: Well i can't say that i agree with this method... It's not like the newb should be "punished" for losing like this. To elaborate what i mean with "punished": Elo should describe skill in some way. The one who played worse than what his elo suggests is not the 1400 elo newb but the 1800 veteran.
|
| 6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
| 7 |
Also,
looking
at
the
first
battle,
the
high
elo
guy
got
just
as
much
as
the
low-elo
one
(
10!)
for
winning
against
somebody
200
elo
below
him.
Wtf?
|
7 |
Also,
looking
at
the
first
battle,
the
high
elo
guy
got
just
as
much
as
the
low-elo
one
(
10!)
for
winning
2v1
against
somebody
200
elo
below
him.
Wtf?
|
Multiplayer imbalances