Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

Nanoframes should not decloak units

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
1/7/2013 6:13:16 PMUSrankjseah before revert after revert
1/7/2013 6:12:58 PMUSrankjseah before revert after revert
Before After
1 I met this problem when designing the anti-bait part of the now defunk AA micro gadget. 1 I met this problem when designing the anti-bait part of the now defunk AA micro gadget.
2 \n 2 \n
3 My solution for preventing hacksaws from shooting avengers was to have Hacksaws and Screamers ignore all airunits with <650 (I think) max hp + vamp; as long as they had more than 300 "dps" of other non-hacksaw/screamer AA within half of their maximum range. 3 My solution for preventing hacksaws from shooting avengers was to have Hacksaws and Screamers ignore all airunits with <650 (I think) max hp + vamp; as long as they had more than 300 "dps" of other non-hacksaw/screamer AA within half of their maximum range.
4 \n 4 \n
5 A land version of this for sniper/scalpel/pene/warlord/etc. would be to ignore things with less than X cost (using currently built cost of buildings) as long as some manner of anti-light units is present within half this unit's maximum range. 5 A land version of this for sniper/scalpel/pene/warlord/etc. would be to ignore things with less than X cost (using currently built cost of buildings) as long as some manner of anti-light units is present within half this unit's maximum range.
6 It's still very hacky and certainly edgecases will prevent problems. It depends on whether the edgecases occur often enough to make ordering them to shoot cheap stuff more of a hassle than ordering them not to shoot. 6 It's still very hacky and certainly edgecases will prevent problems. It depends on whether the edgecases occur often enough to make ordering them to shoot cheap stuff more of a hassle than ordering them not to shoot.
7 \n 7 \n
8 (and whether those cases can be covered by an exception; eg. you almost certainly want a sniper to try to shoot an approaching tick since you might hit and ticks are dangerous) 8 (and whether those cases can be covered by an exception; eg. you almost certainly want a sniper to try to shoot an approaching tick since you might hit and ticks are dangerous)
9 \n 9 \n
10 EDIT: 10 EDIT:
11 and it doesn't stop the "wall" use of nanoframes. Spend a constructor to maintain the wall and the snipers won't be able to hit anything. 11 and it doesn't stop the "wall" use of nanoframes. Spend a constructor to maintain the wall and the snipers won't be able to hit anything, anti-bait or not.