Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

How many times history is destroyed and placed with lies?

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
9/12/2013 8:55:53 PMGBrankKyubey before revert after revert
Before After
1 just a balpark estimate of how much of the worlds "history" is acurate 1 just a balpark estimate of how much of the worlds "history" is acurate
2 \n 2 \n
3 20xx-present: all or most of it (except in rare cases of deliberate manipulation in dictatorship states) thank the [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying_Spaghetti_Monster]FSM[/url] for the internets over 2 billion posible points of view on an issue (and at least 1% of those is archived somewhere) 3 20xx-present: all or most of it (except in rare cases of deliberate manipulation in dictatorship states) thank the [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying_Spaghetti_Monster]FSM[/url] for the internets over 2 billion posible points of view on an issue (and at least 1% of those is archived somewhere)
4 \n 4 \n
5 2000-~1950: major events are accurate and recorded in newspapers, higher precision information is not available other then through unreliable first hand acounts and (sealed/"lost") paper records stored by goverments and large corporations 5 2000-~1950: major events are accurate and recorded in newspapers, higher precision information is not available other then through unreliable first hand acounts and (sealed/"lost") paper records stored by goverments and large corporations
6 \n 6 \n
7 ~1950-~1700 writen records can be taken as accurate only if they have been coroberated by atleast 1 other independent source from the time, large use of cencorship and obfuscation of information occured. archeological data can be taken as accurate if it has been coroberated by writen records 7 ~1950-~1700 writen records can be taken as accurate only if they have been coroberated by atleast 1 other independent source from the time, large use of cencorship and obfuscation of information occured. archeological data can be taken as accurate if it has been coroberated by writen records
8 \n 8 \n
9 ~1700-~500 period during wich larga amounts of information was actively destroyed and/or rewriten only major events can be taken as accurate, and even then would require coroberation by at least archeological evidence and other independent sources 9 ~1700-~500 period during wich larga amounts of information was actively destroyed and/or rewriten only major events can be taken as accurate, and even then would require coroberation by at least archeological evidence and other independent sources
10 \n 10 \n
11 ~500-~1000bc information is more sparse, but of marginaly higher accuracy, large segments are encoded using allegory and myth 11 ~500-~1000bc information is more sparse, but of marginaly higher accuracy, large segments are encoded using allegory and myth
12 \n 12 \n
13 ~1000bc-XXbc only sparse first hand written accounts, and archeological records exist 13 ~1000bc-XXbc only sparse first hand written accounts, and archeological records exist
14 \n 14 \n
15 thats my general guidline 15 thats my general guidline
16 tl:dr 16 tl:dr
17 almost evrything you read in the history books is a lie 17 almost evrything you read in the history books is a lie
18 alot of things you read in reaserch reports are just guesses (but are usualy still MUCH beter then the actual history books) 18 alot of things you read in reaserch reports are just guesses (but are usualy still MUCH beter then the actual history books)
19 \n 19 \n
20 an example: 20 an example:
21 hitler was a man (true) 21 hitler was a man (true)
22 hitler was insane(or the like) (probably not) 22 hitler was insane(or the like) (probably not)
23 hitler was a charismatic leader (true) 23 hitler was a charismatic leader (true)
24 hitler killed 7million jews (true(ish) was probably manipulated in some way) 24 hitler killed 7million jews (true(ish) was probably manipulated in some way)
25 hitler was the worst war criminal of that era (false, see russia, USA) 25 hitler was the worst war criminal of that era (false, see russia, USA)
26 hitler could have won WW2/taken over the world/europe/expanded more then he did ( extremly unlikley, due to the large scale overexpansion mass similtaneous revolts from every anexed country were very likely the instant the war ended, or it would have teken centuries to achive total conquest) 26 hitler could have won WW2/taken over the world/europe/expanded more then he did ( extremly unlikley, due to the large scale overexpansion mass similtaneous revolts from every anexed country were likely the instant the war ended, or it would have teken centuries to achive total conquest)