Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

Idiots in game, please check: It's either me or them

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
9/18/2013 8:22:25 AMAUrankAdminGoogleFrog before revert after revert
Before After
1 @SuperNoob14 I'm a bit annoyed at you for saying you were kickvoted. You implied that you were voted out. Upon watching the replay it turns out that one person voted in favour for kicking you. So where is the voting bloc? 1 @SuperNoob14 I'm a bit annoyed at you for saying you were kickvoted. You implied that you were voted out. Upon watching the replay it turns out that one person voted in favour for kicking you. So where is the voting bloc?
2 \n 2 \n
3 We can't punish anyone for playing poorly or giving bad advice. It's a teamgame so your allies will have ideas regarding the big picture, they are necessarily more correct than your own and you'd probably benefit from discussion. If somebody runs their army in and dies then perhaps you running in as well at the right time would have won it. The best thing to do is communicate. 3 We can't punish anyone for playing poorly or giving bad advice. It's a teamgame so your allies will have ideas regarding the big picture, they are not necessarily more correct than your own and you'd probably benefit from discussion. If somebody runs their army in and dies then perhaps you running in as well at the right time would have won it. The best thing to do is communicate.
4 \n 4 \n
5 People said stupid things but it was rarely malicious. 5 People said stupid things but it was rarely malicious.
6 \n 6 \n
7 I watched the replay pretty quickly but CyberneticPony did not seem to say that much. As far as I could tell the only bad thing he did was start the votekick but when there are enough reasonable people around these votes do nothing. 7 I watched the replay pretty quickly but CyberneticPony did not seem to say that much. As far as I could tell the only bad thing he did was start the votekick but when there are enough reasonable people around these votes do nothing.
8 \n 8 \n
9 As for my opinion on how you played that game. Your greatest problem was that you did not tell (and convince) the rest of your team to move another ground player to your front to fight the 1v2. But failing that you should have gone for defensive stall tactics. Glaives were useless and you built them to late. Zeus, some Rockos and Sniper with a lot heavier defense would have done well. You could afford this if you stopped building Glaives significantly earlier. I think CyberneticPony was wrong. Once you lost your factory building defenses was the best option. There were plenty of other factories in existence for your team and if you could stop the advance on your front your allies could use units to push them back. The defenses you built were a bit weak, I would have started with a nano turret and some heavier defenses, the turret could eventually reclaim the defense and make a factory. 9 As for my opinion on how you played that game. Your greatest problem was that you did not tell (and convince) the rest of your team to move another ground player to your front to fight the 1v2. But failing that you should have gone for defensive stall tactics. Glaives were useless and you built them to late. Zeus, some Rockos and Sniper with a lot heavier defense would have done well. You could afford this if you stopped building Glaives significantly earlier. I think CyberneticPony was wrong. Once you lost your factory building defenses was the best option. There were plenty of other factories in existence for your team and if you could stop the advance on your front your allies could use units to push them back. The defenses you built were a bit weak, I would have started with a nano turret and some heavier defenses, the turret could eventually reclaim the defense and make a factory.
10 \n 10 \n