Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

That Religion Thread continued. Abandon hope all ye who enter here.

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
11/21/2013 11:03:00 PMAUrankSortale before revert after revert
Before After
1 The way I see it, @Forever has abandoned most logic and with it, the capacity of reason (I can provide a quote about 2 forum back from @forever himself if need be). 1 The way I see it, @Forever has abandoned most logic and with it, the capacity of reason (I can provide a quote about 2 forum back from @forever himself if need be).
2 \n 2 \n
3 "since reason is the capacity for consciously making sense of things, applying logic, for establishing and verifying facts, and changing or justifying practices, institutions, and beliefs based on new or existing information." 3 "since reason is the capacity for consciously making sense of things, applying logic, for establishing and verifying facts, and changing or justifying practices, institutions, and beliefs based on new or existing information."
4 \n 4 \n
5 \n 5 \n
6 without reason we cannot make sense of anything and cannot verify any fact. in lieu of reason, all ideas that were mentioned were mere personal opinion. 6 without reason we cannot make sense of anything and cannot verify any fact. in lieu of reason, all ideas that were mentioned were mere personal opinion.
7 \n 7 \n
8 \n 8 \n
9 so @forever , you can choose to abide by logic and have a discussion or you can throw away logic and keep your personal opinion. 9 so @forever , you can choose to abide by logic and have a discussion or you can throw away logic and keep your personal opinion.
10 \n 10 \n
11 \n 11 \n
12 \n 12 \n
13 \n 13 \n
14 to use reason, we must have agreed upon standards. 14 to use reason, we must have agreed upon standards.
15 \n 15 \n
16 \n 16 \n
17 that is an agreed upon accepted source of information (I suggest wikipedia) 17 that is an agreed upon accepted source of information (I suggest wikipedia)
18 \n 18 \n
19 and also agreed upon definition of key concept ( i. e. God, the Orthodox Church, the Bible ( remember there are many version of the Bible) , etc. . . ) 19 and also agreed upon definition of key concept ( i. e. God, the Orthodox Church, the Bible ( remember there are many versions of the Bible) , etc. . . )
20 \n
21 \n 20 \n
22 21 \n
22 And a very important point, within reason, you can always be wrong. No human can be right all the time (unless you are God, which none of us are), the bible cannot be right all the time (remember there are many versions of the Bible each is slightly different). so when you see that you are wrong. please just accept it and move on to the next subject.