Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

Germany: use GSG9 (german special forces) to arrest bitcoin suspects

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
12/5/2013 9:34:27 PMPLrankPhoris before revert after revert
12/5/2013 9:32:51 PMPLrankPhoris before revert after revert
Before After
1 Is 100x growth too much, when there is less than 1 percent chance of success? Some people are risking all their money, all their wealth having that 1 percent chance. When 100 people tried, one succeed - and he's rich. He deserve that, don't you think? Especially if he invested in some new technology (it's the most obvious high risk, hich reward investment) like some computers, programs, tools. BTC is new thing. 1 Is 100x growth too much, when there is less than 1 percent chance of success? Some people are risking all their money, all their wealth having that 1 percent chance. When 100 people tried, one succeed - and he's rich. He deserve that, don't you think? Especially if he invested in some new technology (it's the most obvious high risk, hich reward investment) like some computers, programs, tools. BTC is new thing.
2 \n 2 \n
3 Nobody could say about BTC if it's good or bad investment. Rich men cannot pay others for that information, because nobody knows. The can have only predictions, what means it's still risk. There is always risk. And without men, who were risking there would be no new technologies or products. 3 Nobody could say about BTC if it's good or bad investment. Rich men cannot pay others for that information, because nobody knows. The can have only predictions, what means it's still risk. There is always risyk. And without men, who were risking there would be no new technologies or products.
4 You simply don't see that 99 persons who failed developing or investing in something new. That's why you think 100x growth is too big. Because you see only winners, not losers. 4 You simply don't see that 99 persons who failed developing or investing in something new. That's why you think 100x growth is too big. Because you see only winners, not losers.