Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

AA vs bombers

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
2/26/2014 12:53:12 PMRUrankYogzototh before revert after revert
Before After
1 [quote]isn't that ideal? if your opponent makes a huge investment in AA then you switch to ground and his huge investment is worthless.[/quote] 1 [quote]isn't that ideal? if your opponent makes a huge investment in AA then you switch to ground and his huge investment is worthless.[/quote]
2 \n 2 \n
3 Except you still have your air force, and people rarely bother with reclaiming live units. But more importantly, how is fac becoming useless at some point even close to "ideal"? 3 Except you still have your air force, and people rarely bother with reclaiming live units. But more importantly, how is fac becoming useless at some point even close to "ideal"?
4 \n 4 \n
5 [quote]the only good option for a team without aa is chainsaw. Now you want to nerf or kill it?[/quote] 5 [quote]the only good option for a team without aa is chainsaw. Now you want to nerf or kill it?[/quote]
6 Can i have some special turret that would be good against shieldbots? And i mean entire fac, not some specific ones. 6 Can i have some special turret that would be good against shieldbots? And i mean entire fac, not some specific ones.
7 \n 7 \n
8 How come it is wrong that bombers hard-countering land is wrong, but chainsaw hard-countering air is alright? 8 How come bombers hard-countering land is wrong, but chainsaw hard-countering air is alright?