| 1 |
team elo didn't effect 1vs1 elo but did the other way round. I noticed this when i watched optmius get 1722 1vs1 elo way way back and it changed his team elo, of course as he played team games, his elo dropped back down to 1500's but his 1vs1 elo was still 1722
|
1 |
team elo didn't effect 1vs1 elo but did the other way round. I noticed this when i watched optmius get 1722 1vs1 elo way way back and it changed his team elo, of course as he played team games, his elo dropped back down to 1500's but his 1vs1 elo was still 1722
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
It was the same with sfireman. his 1vs1 elo was 1850 but he had like 2000 team elo and his team elo (all elo) dropped to 1800's but it didn't change his 1vs1 elo.
|
3 |
It was the same with sfireman. his 1vs1 elo was 1850 but he had like 2000 team elo and his team elo (all elo) dropped to 1800's but it didn't change his 1vs1 elo.
|
| 4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
|
|
5 |
Of course with the latest changes this is not possible anymore. But i was just stating the flaw with the current system of a combined elo system in regards to balance.
|
| 5 |
If you noticed my 1vs1 elo is terrible and i kept it that way. Of course I could easily improve my 1vs1 but then it would unbalance all team games so I have on purpose kept my 1vs1 elo bad as my team elo (all elo) has risen to 1600-1700's.
|
6 |
If you noticed my 1vs1 elo is terrible and i kept it that way. Of course I could easily improve my 1vs1 but then it would unbalance all team games so I have on purpose kept my 1vs1 elo bad as my team elo (all elo) has risen to 1600-1700's.
|
Zero-k v1.2.3.7 - Messing with Jumpies