| 1 |
yea, stdev is totaly irrelevant
|
1 |
yea, stdev is totaly irrelevant
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
if anything, considering that the winning team had on avrage 27 points more ELO stdev then loosing team having a higher stdev is counterintuitavely a beter indicator of who will win then elo diffrance
|
3 |
if anything, considering that the winning team had on avrage 27 points more ELO stdev then loosing team having a higher stdev is counterintuitavely a beter indicator of who will win then elo diffrance
|
| 4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
| 5 |
afres some copious deleting of games that were 2v2 or less i got down to 1415 games
|
5 |
afres some copious deleting of games that were 2v2 or less i got down to 1415 games
|
| 6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
| 7 |
winers had:
|
7 |
winers had:
|
| 8 |
avg elo of 1651, and stdev of 202
|
8 |
avg elo of 1651, and stdev of 202
|
| 9 |
\n
|
9 |
\n
|
| 10 |
loosers had
|
10 |
loosers had
|
| 11 |
\n
|
11 |
\n
|
| 12 |
avg elo of 1628, and stdev of 178
|
12 |
avg elo of 1628, and stdev of 178
|
| 13 |
\n
|
13 |
\n
|
| 14 |
the diferance between loosers and winners was on avrage:
|
14 |
the diferance between loosers and winners was on avrage:
|
| 15 |
22 ELO with, and 24 stdev (this sugests that larger stdev is better for winning)
|
15 |
22 ELO with, and 24 stdev (this sugests that larger stdev is better for winning)
|
| 16 |
\n
|
16 |
\n
|
| 17 |
intrestingly enough, of the 525 teams that had less elo then enemy and still won:
|
17 |
intrestingly enough, of the 525 teams that had less elo then enemy and still won:
|
| 18 |
1625 avg elo
|
18 |
1625 avg elo
|
| 19 |
37 points less on avarage then enemy elo
|
19 |
37 points less on avarage then enemy elo
|
| 20 |
which was 1662 on avarage
|
20 |
which was 1662 on avarage
|
| 21 |
\n
|
21 |
\n
|
| 22 |
had 201 stdev for the winners, and 186 stdev for the loosers
|
22 |
had 201 stdev for the winners, and 186 stdev for the loosers
|
| 23 |
\n
|
23 |
\n
|
| 24 |
\n
|
24 |
\n
|
| 25 |
the other games (where winning team had more elo)
|
25 |
the other games (where winning team had more elo)
|
| 26 |
had 204 stdev for the winners, and 173 stdev for the loosers
|
26 |
had 204 stdev for the winners, and 173 stdev for the loosers
|
| 27 |
\n
|
27 |
\n
|
|
|
28 |
\n
|
|
|
29 |
no notable corelation between stdev(win-lose) and ELO(win-lose) to be found
|
|
|
30 |
\n
|
| 28 |
make of that what you will, im going to sleep
|
31 |
make of that what you will, im going to sleep
|
| 29 |
\n
|
32 |
\n
|
| 30 |
\n
|
33 |
\n
|
| 31 |
\n
|
34 |
\n
|
Alternative balance