Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

Alternative balance

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
4/16/2014 5:02:22 PMGBrankKyubey before revert after revert
4/16/2014 4:47:30 PMGBrankKyubey before revert after revert
4/16/2014 4:47:00 PMGBrankKyubey before revert after revert
4/16/2014 4:44:25 PMGBrankKyubey before revert after revert
4/16/2014 4:42:00 PMGBrankKyubey before revert after revert
4/16/2014 4:39:35 PMGBrankKyubey before revert after revert
4/16/2014 4:37:53 PMGBrankKyubey before revert after revert
Before After
1 vanilla 1 vanilla
2 without limits, 509/901, 56% of all game outcomes +117 points 2 without limits, 509/901, 56% of all game outcomes +117 points
3 with limits: 3 with limits:
4 +1000 scores 160 corect, 176 wrong 4 +1000 scores 160 corect, 176 wrong
5 +500 scores 190 correct, 199 wrong 5 +500 scores 190 correct, 199 wrong
6 +250 291 correct, 237 wrong (32% accuracy, 26% wrong) 6 +250 291 correct, 237 wrong (32% accuracy, 26% wrong)
7 (its not any beter (actualy slightly worse) then random guessing) 7 (its not any beter (actualy slightly worse) then random guessing)
8 \n 8 \n
9 \n 9 \n
10 my algorithm 10 my algorithm
11 without limits, it pridicts 537/888, 60% of all game outcomes +186 points 11 without limits, it pridicts 537/888, 60% of all game outcomes +186 points
12 with limits it scores: 12 with limits it scores:
13 401 correct, 234 wrong (45% accuracy, 25% wrong) 13 401 correct, 234 wrong (45% accuracy, 25% wrong)
14 \n 14 \n
15 my algorithm is better in 69 cases (and would win me more money gambling) 15 my algorithm is better in 69 cases (and would win me more money gambling)
16 \n 16 \n
17 @Anarchid 17 @Anarchid
18 10% better then random in a system that is meant to be random is significant 18 10% better then random in a system that is meant to be random is significant
19 also you arent using the limmits, with limmits i can accurately predict the outcome of a game 45% of the time with a high level of certainty that i will be right (if this was gambling i would be rolling in the money) 19 also you arent using the limmits, with limmits i can accurately predict the outcome of a game 45% of the time with a high level of certainty that i will be right (if this was gambling i would be rolling in the money)
20 \n 20 \n
21 (30% of the games were too balanced to tell anything concrete from them) 21 (30% of the games were too balanced to tell anything concrete from them)
22 \n
23 \n
24 also if you negatively weigh bieng wrong
25 (-1.5 or 2 per instance instead of -1 that is used)
26 vanilla can not get a positive score at all
27 my one breaks even at +40