| 1 |
Thanks @Brackman for getting some things spelt out in detail that were, at times, formulated only very vaguely.
|
1 |
Thanks @Brackman for getting some things spelt out in detail that were, at times, formulated only very vaguely.
|
| 2 |
[color=#222222]I
hate
to
be
that
guy,
but
you
missed
a
T_
in
"(
with
elo
multiset
l)
".
.
.
And
it
was
probably
not
needed
to
use
w
and
X_k
as
parameters
each
time
for
the
avg
and
Var
functions,
it's
clear
what
you
mean
and
would
make
stuff
more
readable.
But
I
won't
complain
about
people
being
rigorous
in
this
thread.
:D[/color]
|
2 |
[color=#333333]I
hate
to
be
that
guy,
but
you
missed
a
T_
in
"(
with
elo
multiset
l)
".
.
.
And
it
was
probably
not
needed
to
use
w
and
X_k
as
parameters
each
time
for
the
avg
and
Var
functions,
it's
clear
what
you
mean
and
would
make
stuff
more
readable.
But
I
won't
complain
about
people
being
rigorous
in
this
thread.
:D[/color]
|
| 3 |
\n
|
3 |
\n
|
| 4 |
[quote]I guess it's 1. It should be 2.[/quote]
|
4 |
[quote]I guess it's 1. It should be 2.[/quote]
|
| 5 |
I vaguely recall that the current minimization function has the 1 because it makes it easier (or rather possible) to swap players between teams without having to recalculate the entire function every single time. Which, given the amount of summations occuring in your draft, makes a world of difference...
|
5 |
I vaguely recall that the current minimization function has the 1 because it makes it easier (or rather possible) to swap players between teams without having to recalculate the entire function every single time. Which, given the amount of summations occuring in your draft, makes a world of difference...
|
Alternative balance