| 1 |
[quote] There was nothing wrong with leaving it alone. I don't know why it had to be changed at all. [/quote]
|
1 |
[quote] There was nothing wrong with leaving it alone. I don't know why it had to be changed at all. [/quote]
|
| 2 |
In the end it comes down to how silly it looks when your economy has no game-world representation.
|
2 |
In the end it comes down to how silly it looks when your economy has no game-world representation.
|
| 3 |
\n
|
3 |
\n
|
| 4 |
You see a solar, and you can shoot it knowing it gives +2 to enemy.
|
4 |
You see a solar, and you can shoot it knowing it gives +2 to enemy.
|
| 5 |
\n
|
5 |
\n
|
| 6 |
You see a commander and you can only guess if it's an uber skirmisher, or a walking rezzing fusion.
|
6 |
You see a commander and you can only guess if it's an uber skirmisher, or a walking rezzing fusion.
|
| 7 |
\n
|
7 |
\n
|
| 8 |
With raised default incomes in previous stable, people (like randy and klon) had those abominable +14e commanders, to the extent that during first 3-4 minutes their bases had almost no energy buildings whatsoever.
|
8 |
With raised default incomes in previous stable, people (like randy and klon) had those abominable +14e commanders, to the extent that during first 3-4 minutes their bases had almost no energy buildings whatsoever.
|
| 9 |
\n
|
9 |
\n
|
| 10 |
And that's boring to look at.
|
10 |
And that's boring to look at.
|
|
|
11 |
\n
|
|
|
12 |
[quote] Im all for commander specialization but nerfing them? They were waste of metal as it was before nerf :([/quote]
|
|
|
13 |
Jumpy+regen+range+ecell was not particularly cost-ineffective. In fact it was quite good.
|
|
|
14 |
\n
|
|
|
15 |
Such things provoke the revertman.
|
Zero-k v1.2.4.9 - Commander nerfs and UI polish