Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

Tarantula

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
7/28/2014 6:50:20 PMGBrankTheEloIsALie before revert after revert
7/28/2014 6:47:21 PMGBrankTheEloIsALie before revert after revert
Before After
1 [quote]sauce=basic logic 1 [quote]sauce=basic logic
2 player that moves first will allways be the "attacking" player, while player that moves second will allways be the racting player. 2 player that moves first will allways be the "attacking" player, while player that moves second will allways be the racting player.
3 the reacting player can not win in balanced game with a finite number of actions...[/quote] 3 the reacting player can not win in balanced game with a finite number of actions...[/quote]
4 \n 4 \n
5 [img]http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/think_logically.png[/img] 5 [img]http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/think_logically.png[/img]
6 http://xkcd.com/1112/ 6 http://xkcd.com/1112/
7 \n 7 \n
8 [quote]and chess only has ~10^43 posible moves [/quote] 8 [quote]and chess only has ~10^43 posible moves [/quote]
9 That does nothing to prove your point. 9 That does nothing to prove your point.
10 \n 10 \n
11 In a human vs human match, being able to "set the tone" and start aggressively may be an advantage. In game theory, there's no such thing. And your perfect players are exactly the case for game theory. 11 In a human vs human match, being able to "set the tone" and start aggressively may be an advantage. In game theory, there's no such thing. And your perfect players are exactly the case for game theory.
12 \n 12 \n
13 All your arguments also apply to this situation: 13 All your arguments also apply to this situation:
14 http://www.apronus.com/chess/wbeditor.php?p=A____________________p______________P____________________________0 14 http://www.apronus.com/chess/wbeditor.php?p=A____________________p______________P____________________________0
15 (fuck the kings, you get the point). See the issue? 15 (fuck the kings, you get the point). See the issue?
16 \n
17 [quote] chess and tic tac toe become the same game, and as evryone knows... in tic tac toe the player that does the first move allways wins[/quote]
18 Lol. I mean, aside from the fact that chess and tic-tac-toe are not the same game from a game theory standpoint, the player that moves first in tic-tac-toe does [b]NOT[/b] always win. If the other player plays perfectly, it's always a draw.
19 Seeing as you're not even getting these basic facts straight, it pretty much disqualifies you from even talking about the game theoretical aspects of chess.
20 Lol again, that statement is just too cute. xD