Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   
Map: Thornford 2
 Thornford 2
Title: [A] Free For All
Host: Nobody
Game version: Zero-K v1.7.3.3
Engine version: 104.0.1-1060-g7f3541f
Battle ID: 694781
Started: 5 years ago
Duration: 36 minutes
Players: 4
Bots: False
Mission: False
Rating: Casual
Watch Replay Now
Manual download

Team 1 Lost
Chance of victory: 4.2%
XP gained: 97
CArank[G0G0]Dancer died in 21 minutes
Team 2 Lost
Chance of victory: 46.1%
XP gained: 97
AUrank4hundred died in 32 minutes
Team 3 Won!
Chance of victory: 8.8%
XP gained: 175
USrankJasper
Team 4 Lost
Chance of victory: 40.9%
XP gained: 97
RUrankizirayd died in 36 minutes
Spectators
FIrank_edrush
Firepluk
AUrankAdminAquanim
USrankpotatoalienof13




Preview
Filter:    Player:  
sort
RUrankizirayd
5 years ago
FFA games are very expensive, I lost 3 games in a row, lost 50 elo :(
+0 / -0


GBrankPRO_Dregs
5 years ago
That sounds more like slightly expensive than very. Try losing 100+ elo in a single 1v1 loss and you will know punishment. I think I overheard a fix for ratings coming soon.
+0 / -0
RUrankizirayd
5 years ago
(edited 5 years ago)
in 1 on 1 everything is in your hands, in ffa everything is generally random @Sparkles
p.s for winning 9 vs 9 give 7 elo (my win rate ~51%) in ffa my winrate in it month 0%
+0 / -0


GBrankPRO_Dregs
5 years ago
Tru. Tru. FFA you can blame the wind direction, fate, bullying, the cat used cheats, whatever. In 1v1, you stand alone, existentially flawed as your rating melts through your grip, leaving you a clutching skeleton on a pile of molten flesh. Either way the ever turning wheel of ZeroKsara continues it's cycle.
+1 / -0