Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   
Back to List

TheHunters-v3

By AlexMax
Rating:

A 16x16 map, converted from Starcraft by AlexMax, good for up to 8 players
Size: 16 x 16

PLAY ON THIS MAP


Downloads: 13077
Manual downloads:
http://zero-k.info/content/maps/TheHunters-v3.sd7
http://zero-k.info/content/games/TheHunters-v3.sd7

Last battles

Bots B2021503 3 on TheHunters-v3
Bots B1742069 3 on TheHunters-v3
Multiplayer B1618689 4 on TheHunters-v3
Bots B1576723 2 on TheHunters-v3
Bots B1570571 4 on TheHunters-v3
Multiplayer B1569568 6 on TheHunters-v3
Multiplayer B1568060 3 on TheHunters-v3
Bots B1567294 3 on TheHunters-v3
Bots B1566728 1 on TheHunters-v3
Multiplayer B1565329 2 on TheHunters-v3


Preview
Filter:    Player:  
sort
USrank[1uP]Willk
14 years ago
Very nice FFA map, and such a classic of CA. Oh the time of the massive FFA wars on the test mod :P
+0 / -0

AUrankAdminSaktoth
13 years ago
Featuring this, a FFA classic.
+0 / -0
Firepluk
10 years ago
epic ffa map, one of the best imo
+0 / -0

DErankAdminmojjj
10 years ago
remember the layout and name from scbw -.-
+0 / -0
Skasi
10 years ago
Nah it's much too dark, Fire. Would need inverted /darkening, but that doesn't exist I think. :(
+0 / -0


AUrankAdminGoogleFrog
10 years ago
Make a remake with an improved texture? Perhaps shore cliffs could be touched up too for consistent pathing.
+3 / -0


CArankTheMooseIsLoose
10 years ago
Consistent in which way? Right now hovers are mostly blocked with a few gaps. Should this be fully pathable for hovers or no?
+0 / -0

CArankPxtl
10 years ago
CArankTheMooseIsLoose - neither. The point is that hover-pathable ramps should be more visible and should be designed into the balance of the map. On this map their presence feels pretty random and doesn't look like it was intentional.
+2 / -0


EErankAdminAnarchid
10 years ago
Make it look as pretty as the original :P
+0 / -0


CArankTheMooseIsLoose
7 years ago
bumping for nostalgia
+0 / -0
USrankDave[tB]
2 years ago
(edited 2 years ago)
Why is this map still featured?

I ask because:
- It is extremely ugly
- Hover pathing is very broken.

A year or two I made this: http://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/60348

Is my version perfect? definitely not, and I've gotten better at doing textures since. But it does have a much better texture than THIS, and includes non-broken hover pathing. It also has better boxes that allow for 4-way ffas as well.
+4 / -0

AUrankAdminAquanim
2 years ago
Moved to supported. I would just unsupport it but I do not know why it was featured.
+0 / -0


EErankAdminAnarchid
2 years ago
quote:
Moved to supported. I would just unsupport it but I do not know why it was featured.

I'd bet because FFA maps are quite rare.
+0 / -0

AUrankAdminAquanim
2 years ago
Rephrase: I do not know why it was featured simultaneously with a newer version of the map being featured. Normally when that happens it is because the newer version has substantial gameplay differences or the old version was required for campaign at some point. I'm not aware of either applying here.
+1 / -0

PLrankAdminSprung
2 years ago
I looked at logs and I'm fairly certain it's fine to unsupport, doing so now.

quote:
I do not know why it was featured.

[Spoiler]
+1 / -0
Back to List