engine 102.0 performance experiences

post here your experiences with 102.0 engine.

since when is 102.0 default for autohosts?

i for myself have the impression that it lags hard. even on small maps. it is close to be unplayable.

examples
B423109 10 on FolsomDamDeluxeV4
B423107 11 on Into Battle_v3

maybe devs could set up a performance measurement like they already did some time ago with that googledrive excel table?

post here your own experiences.

trees are performace killers for me. i was experiencing lags on Quicksilver, but now some lagging occur even on Altair Crossing. usually the workaround for me is to micro units with high camera pan on which trees are not rendered.

The funniest part is that the tree eligibility tester in the tree vertex shader detects streetlights on Intersection as valid trees.

Looks quite uncannily terrifying.

The engine passed the performance test for me and there were no widespread complaints so more rigorous testing was not required. We were using an engine very similar to 102 for a few weeks previously. mojjj can you run the profiler?

I blame your CPU

Contrary to everyone else Spring 102 runs a bit smoother than 100 used to and 98 ran much worse than 91 and 100. 100 definetely ran better than 91 to me as well.

It would be good to gather actual data first before jumping to conclusions don't you think?
Someone like GoogleFrog should make a benchmark sheet assess which one performs better.

What about your specs?

i have had the same results that Shaman has had on two different computers, one a 4th gen i7 with nvidia 765 the other a 1st gen i7 with radeon 5870