i believe two wrongs dont make a right so i wont riddicule you dohieu19 but i will say this..
don't play to much of ✠✠✠✠ zerok ✠✠✠✠ only go on better game RTS
attempting to alienate the very poeople who love the game you dont is out of touch.. its like telling a fish you dont like water..
your game suggestions may have good games in among them.. but its possible for games to not replace eachother.. i like zero-k and bar but i dont concider either better as they are a mix of ups and downs..
[Spoiler]
the people who play this game like this game.. 'better' after all is a point of view when it comes to innocent computer games.. perhaps if it was a child playing a violent game there could be an argument for some intrinsic value to protecting them from psycological harm.
but even then some scientists suggest that violent people committing vilent acts on games do them less in real life as a result of vicarious expression.. so.. idk..
im getting off track..
when i want to show somone who likes apples about how good pears are.. i stand a much better chance of doing that by saying "oh you like apples and so do i.. ? have you tried pears ?"
as opposed to saying "you like apples and i hate apples so we are different but i like pears so you will like pears.. ! so you should like pears now too !"
this is because your indicating a difference in preferance to those who play and like this game before even presenting your alternatives. and i believe this does not bode well for sharing interests.. that being said perhaps you could clarify what exactly 'better' entails as its lacking a proper context..
better graphics?
better pacing?
better progression?
even then most of the time better just means different and everything is a tradeoff imho.
also if you present your oppinions on neutral standing so they are not above.. avoiding words like 'better' that allow and respect the preferances of free inderviduals it acts as a sign of mutual respect that may be reflected in concession for your own ideas of good
