Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Make hammer useful in more than vast hordes

21 posts, 832 views
Post comment
Filter:    Player:  
Page of 2 (21 records)
sort
9 years ago
Namely, buff its aoe, dps and projectile speed so it could hit something other than pork and actually 'damage' it.
+0 / -0


9 years ago
The title is untrue because a few Hammers are quite useful for killing defenses.

A slightly more powerful Hammer would be spammed and destroy everything due to its high range and low cost. It has happened before.
+0 / -0
9 years ago
My main concern is that hammers are completely countered by a single shield and take a 'long' time to take down a heavy lazor while also being useless vs units which makes them "would-be skirmish vaguely artillery". For their mass you could make a pack of Ravagers and these are spammed and destroy everything on regular basis in recent games.
+0 / -0


9 years ago
Hammers are not completely countered by a single shield. This is a common misconception.

Thug shield charge/second/cost

(16 charge/second)/(180 cost)

0.0889

Aegis charge/second/cost

(50 charge/second)/(480 cost + (10.5 energy/second)*((4000 cost)/(225 energy/second)))

0.075

Hammer damage/second/cost

(150 damage/ 6 seconds)/(130 cost)

0.192

If your opponent has shields then less than half cost in Hammers will eventually penetrate those shields. Sure, they do not utterly destroy shields but that has to be the case for shields to be usable.

You will have a hard time comparing units across roles. Whether Hammer or Ravager is more powerful will vary depending on the situation. If Ravagers are more common then perhaps the situation for Ravagers occurs more often. Units do not have to be used as often as each other to be balanced. You would be better off comparing Hammer to other artillery.
+4 / -0
9 years ago
That i will. Theorycrafting is nice and good but what ive seen is bunch of hammers bringing shield low but never penetrating because it recharges between their long reloads.
To other artilleries: one impaler destroys llt and defender in one shot, hlt in a few. Same mass of hammers are inferior in range, accuracy and takedown time.
Pillager: actually good vs heavy units due to decent dps.
Tremor: very good vs massed shields while hammers cannot pierce one.
Pene: huge alpha, very good vs heavy and medium units. Hammers are good vs none.
Sniper: superior range, alpha and stealth.
+0 / -0
FIrankFFC
9 years ago
You do realize that hammers are also cheap, unlike other things you mentioned?
+3 / -0


9 years ago
If you can't eventually pierce shields with Hammers then you did not bring enough Hammers. They lose out in terms of penetration so perhaps you should bring Hammers and a high alpha artillery piece to both counter the regen and penetrate at a higher charge level.

Your comparison to artillery approaches some good points but it would be best if you stuck to facts.

Impaler does have the range advantage but overkills a lot against Defender and HLT. It deals 800 damage with Defender at 300 health and HLT at 2475. The 700 metal investment for Impaler is also quite high when you only need two Hammers to rapidly clear a Defender forest. A group of Hammers of similar cost will destroy a HLT much faster than an Impaler will. So Hammer wins or weight and takedown time. Both units have their role.

Pillager is actually quite good against units. It suffers from inaccuracy against thin turrets and is unable to move and fire.

Tremors have 0.25 DPS which is a bit better than Hammer DPS of 0.192 but the difference is not large enough to say that Tremor is awesome vs shields while Hammer is useless. Tremors are unable to focus down a single shield because many shots will miss. They are also a large investment and worse against small turrets. So what is it that makes Tremor much better vs shields? I think you are failing to take the low cost of Hammer into account.

Penetrator has over 3x the reload time of Hammer so it would be hard for one of the units to make the other obsolete. If being bad against units was a problem then Impaler would be useless.

Finally Sniper. Sniper is by far the most worrying unit for Hammer role overlap, especially because they are in the same factory. Hammer has a significant range (840 vs 700, remember, stick to facts!), speed and DPS advantage over Sniper but this is probably not enough. Snipers are very good against a large class of midgame transition units so they pay for themselves in the extra utility. This would be a useful thread if it just stuck to a discussion of the uses and balance of Hammer and Sniper.
+4 / -0
9 years ago
"If you can't eventually pierce shields with Hammers then you did not bring enough Hammers. They lose out in terms of penetration so perhaps you should bring Hammers and a high alpha artillery piece to both counter the regen and penetrate at a higher charge level."

Or you can bring "just" the high alpha artillery.

Sorry about not checking the ranges, i confused range of sniper and sniper com.
+0 / -0


9 years ago
If that is the only sentence of my post you disagree with then I will simply remove it. You've got to respond to more than a small part of what I say for a discussion to occur.
+0 / -0
9 years ago
Hmm isnt Tremor dps calculated 'per projectile', of which there are 'many'?
+0 / -0


9 years ago
Oops I tend to mean DPS/cost. I don't know what you mean by damage per second per projectile. Fire rate is taken into account in DPS/cost, that is what DPS means.

Tremor DPS/cost = (135 damage/projectile)*(1/0.36 projectiles/second)/(1500 cost)
+0 / -0
Hammers are competing with both the rocko and sharp-shooter. I don't consider them to be core to cloaky fac, but they are the earliest legitimate artillery in the game, allowing you to make opposing statics redundant much earlier than other facs. This is very useful when striving for high priority real estate early in the game.
+1 / -0
9 years ago
The problem with hammers that make them barely effective that it has some worst AOE in the game meaning that it cannot really hit defenses from the distance at all. This is just makes them frustrating to use them at times. Perhaps some more aoe could be given them like the one of a Ravager.
+0 / -0

9 years ago
Hammer can damage defences and slow units. It has enought range to counter most defence building. And hammer is very cheap. This mean you can respond with them vs early defender spam too. Who is very annoying.. Hammers is nice.
+0 / -0


9 years ago
A hammer two-shots a defender. It's not accurate when shooting mobiles or radar dots, but hey, it lives in a factory with best cloaked scouts, which you should also field anyway just for the annoyance.
+1 / -0


9 years ago
hammers are great for when early game porc collides - you both start spamming defenders just out of range of eachother, and then a single hammer can break the tie.

its otherwise terribly suck and situational.
+1 / -0

9 years ago
Move hammer to jumpfac.

Because.
+0 / -0

9 years ago
Seriously, hammers + cloaked scouts are awesome atm. They're used in both teams and 1v1 games.
+2 / -0
9 years ago
Can this and other threads alike be moved out of development forum so that it wont trash it? thanks
+0 / -0

9 years ago
I have a better idea. Update the CoC to disallow discussion of game mechanics, alongside religion and politics. No one will get fired up again.
+1 / -0
Page of 2 (21 records)