Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Organise a 2v2 someone?

11 posts, 335 views
Post comment
Filter:    Player:  
sort


AUrank4hundred
12 months ago
Been a good year since last 2v2 comp, Anyone up for organizing?.. I would but good chance i wanna participate, and that would be a conflict of interest
+2 / -0



RUrankFirepluk
12 months ago
(edited 12 months ago)

Yes, resign festival!
The last I participated in with PLrankFailer, - got mad, resigned, Failer won :P
+1 / -0


PLrankzenfur
12 months ago
I could participate if it were to happen in christmas period.

Cheers
+3 / -0

BEranktjorndec
12 months ago
We are with 6 friends who regulary play zero-k now. A 2v2 competition would be nice :) Guess you can count 3 more teams in then.
+1 / -0


AUrank4hundred
12 months ago
(edited 12 months ago)

A suggestion is teams participating in the 2v2 should only permit a maximum combined elo.

This would:

create a more competitive, less predictable competition.
Encourage lesser skilled\experienced players to get involved.
Encourage teamwork.

Depending on how extreme you want the threshold, im thinking somewhere between 3600 - 3900.

The elo\whr would be referenced from the date the tournament is announced as to avoid tanking.
+1 / -0


JPrankgajop
12 months ago
Problem with average rating thing is that it would encourage inactivity. My rating dropped a lot since I last played. I think I gained 2 ranks after 3 games.
But I do agree with the idea: prevent top players from completely trashing everyone.
+0 / -0


AUrank4hundred
12 months ago
(edited 12 months ago)

yes that and some top 50 players getting a stab at it, but yes a Sigero\anir or dein\gf would just own. that needs to be avoided.

it's a gauge, not a perfect science, besides 2v2 is not 1v1 and it's not lobstercluster. but this would realte to casual whr not 1v1.

and considering what you said, there would be a risk of a returning pro whom is not listed, but im sure a history value can be applied to avoid. Also, Encourage inactivity?, increasing rust makes the cogs spin slower.

basically if your a 1950 + player you cant participate with an around equal, u have to pair with a 1800 or sub player.

Also most prefer a friendly team mate or someone they enjoy playing with, this will supersede skimming the edges of upper limit, I mean could Corvus really play more than 2 games with anyone without civil war?
+0 / -0


JPrankgajop
12 months ago
Actually I'm not even sure how rating decay works now.
I think, if I'm free, I'd play regardless of whether or not there was a rating limit.
+0 / -0


CHrankAdminDeinFreund
12 months ago
CHrankAdminDeinFreund + ROrankSigero wubbing up.
+1 / -0


GBrank[GBC]1v0ry_k1ng
12 months ago
Can I enter two AI
+2 / -0

LUrankAnir
12 months ago
Maybe the tournament organizer should have to grant each team. + Elo-Limit

Btw, when we are talking about elo limit, i guess you mean Casual Elo.
+0 / -0