Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   
Title: MM 1972: 1v1, Rank Singularity
Host: Nobody
Game version: Zero-K v1.8.12.1
Engine version: 104.0.1-1544-ge1f249f
Battle ID: 1031663
Started: 3 years ago
Duration: 20 minutes
Players: 2
Bots: False
Mission: False
Rating: Competitive
Watch Replay Now
Manual download

Team 1
Chance of victory: 53.7%

RUrankizirayd
Team 2
Chance of victory: 46.3%

USrankAdminSteel_Blue
Spectators

Show winners



Preview
Filter:    Player:  
sort
3 years ago
When will the domination of the kodachi over the glaives be corrected?

Okay, explain to me the following, why the kodachi is stronger than the glaive, while the tank constructor is stronger than the cloak constructor, why does the tank constructor survive against the glaives? This is not logical, let the kodachi deal with the protection of their constructors, but instead they are free to deal only with raids. The dumb game slapped me again with a reminder that you cannot play in the factories you want, otherwise you will be fucked by kodachi
+1 / -0
3 years ago
Cloaks vs tanks does feel like one of the most lopsided matchups in the game, for sure.
+0 / -0
3 years ago
At least cloakies can take advantage of the cost difference and make a lot more units and be in more places on the map. I personally hate playing rovers into tanks cause ogre beats basically everything in the factory. (Though maybe I just don't play it correctly.)
+0 / -0


3 years ago
Taking advantage of glaive granularity vs tanks is a disadvantage not present vs some other popular factories (jumps, spiders). If you go granular, welder / single llt just messes you up. If you go full-ball, kodachi messes you up.

The only hope in this matchup is a few very well placed imps which is not as viable on open maps, though this one has at least 5 good chokepoints for early-mid. You need to fortify as few locations as you can with the too-slow to prevent kodachi going around reaver to expand. Then you 100% NEED to drop heavy knight pressure into their base ASAP.

Good luck.
+2 / -0